Attitudes, Community engagement, Health insurance, Intervention, Knowledge, Original Research, peer reviewed, Population coverage
Demographic factors, Hypertension, Original Research, Patient satisfaction, peer reviewed, Provided services, Waiting time
peer reviewed, Praziquantel, Schistosomiasis, schistosomiasis control, Short Communication, Sudan, Teacher-centred
Public Health – Open Journal [ISSN 2472-3878]: Building a Healthier World, Together
Connecting Voices, Shaping Solutions
Public Health – Open Journal bridges the gap between research, policy, and practice, offering a platform for robust discussions on critical issues impacting health systems globally and locally. We delve into disease prevention, health promotion, and the intricate dynamics that shape individual and community well-being.
Beyond Borders, Beyond Silos
Public health knows no boundaries. We embrace diverse perspectives from individuals, organizations, governments, and communities worldwide, fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange across sectors and borders. Together, we strive for innovative solutions that address health challenges at every level.
Rigor, Openness, Impact
Our esteemed editorial and review board members, renowned experts in diverse fields, meticulously ensure the highest standards of scientific rigor and practical application in every published piece. Through open access, we freely share cutting-edge research and insights, empowering all stakeholders to drive positive change.
Uniting for a Healthier Future
Join the conversation. Share your research, ideas, and experiences. Public Health – Open Journal welcomes contributions from researchers, practitioners, policymakers, advocates, and the public alike. Together, let’s build a healthier world, one informed discussion at a time.
Our Commitment to DEIAC
At Openventio, we are committed to promoting Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Capacity (DEIAC) in all aspects of our publication. We believe that DEIAC is essential for advancing scientific knowledge and improving health outcomes for all. We strive to create a publication environment that is open, fair, respectful, and representative of the diversity of the scholarly community and society at large. We adhere to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practices in Scholarly Publishing and follow the guidance and recommendations from various resources on DEIAC in scholarly publishing. We welcome and support the participation and contribution of authors, editors, reviewers, and readers from diverse backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences. We also monitor and evaluate the impact and effectiveness of our DEIAC policies and practices, and seek to continuously improve them.
Public Health – Open Journal (PHOJ): Illuminating the Path to a Healthier World
Aims and Scope
Trending Topics
Types of Articles
Call for Submissions
PHOJ welcomes contributions from:
Audiences
Publishing Schedule
Openventio follows a flexible publishing schedule, releasing articles bi-annually or annually based on editorial considerations and submission volume. While we strive for consistent frequency, exceptional circumstances may occasionally necessitate adjustments to ensure the quality and timeliness of published content.
Archiving
CrossRef is a major player in the world of digital archiving for scholarly publications. At Openventio, we believe in preserving knowledge for future generations. That’s why we proudly leverage CrossRef DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) to archive all our published articles. These unique, persistent identifiers act as a key, ensuring your research remains accessible and discoverable forever, even if publisher platforms or URLs change. Imagine your work, always retrievable, always relevant, contributing to the ever-evolving tapestry of knowledge. With CrossRef DOIs, your research embarks on a journey that transcends time, leaving a lasting mark on the academic landscape.
Openventio Publishers CrossRef DOI prefix is: 10.17140
Continuous Improvement
We value feedback and encourage comments and suggestions from all readers. Through collaborative knowledge sharing and open dialogue, we can continuously improve the quality and relevance of PHOJ, ensuring it remains a vital resource for building a healthier future for all.
A New Era of Ethical Publishing!
The tide has turned in scholarly publishing, thanks to organizations like COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, ICMJE, and AMA. They’ve diligently set the bar for ethical conduct, ushering in a golden age of research integrity.
Openventio Embraces the Standard
We at Openventio wholeheartedly applaud these efforts. We’re committed to upholding the highest scientific and ethical standards, striving for excellence in everything we publish.
Guiding Our Steps
To safeguard the integrity of our publications, we pledge to be guided by:
By embracing these principles, Openventio stands as a beacon of ethical, high-quality publishing, dedicated to advancing knowledge and making a difference in the world.
PUBLISHING PRINCIPLES
General Guidelines
Structure and Flow: At Openventio, we recognize the value of organized and logical presentation in research articles. While the modern AIMRAD format (Aims, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) serves as a strong foundation, we understand that flexibility is key. We encourage authors to adapt the structure to best suit their research and ensure clear communication of findings. Different article types like meta-analyses or case reports may benefit from non-linear structures, and we welcome innovative approaches that enhance reader understanding.
Embracing the Power of Technology: The digital age has opened doors for enriching research publications. Authors can enhance their work by incorporating supplementary materials, interactive elements, and cross-linking to relevant resources. It is important to note that all supplemental materials should be submitted alongside the primary manuscript for peer review.
Reporting Guidelines
Rigor and Transparency: Openventio upholds accurate and detailed reporting for all research published in our journals. We advocate for authors to adhere to relevant reporting guidelines like Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) for trials, STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) for observational studies, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) for systematic reviews, STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) for diagnostic accuracy studies and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) for for reporting meta-analyses of observational studies. These guidelines offer structured frameworks that ensure essential information is presented, allowing for thorough evaluation by editors, reviewers, and readers.
Review Manuscripts with Confidence: Authors crafting review manuscripts should actively document their search methodology, including data source selection, extraction, and synthesis processes. This level of transparency is crucial, especially for systematic reviews, to build trust and enable readers to effectively assess the evidence presented.
Valuable Resources: Seeking guidance on reporting guidelines? Explore resources like the EQUATOR Network and the NLM’s Research Reporting Guidelines and Initiatives. These platforms offer invaluable tools and expertise to help authors adhere to best practices and deliver high-quality research publications.
SUMMARY OF MANUSCRIPT FORMATS AND TYPES
Openventio offers diverse manuscript formats, including full-length articles, short articles, protocol papers, and short communications, each adhering to specific requirements outlined in the table below.
Format |
Description | Research-based | Review-based | Case-based |
Other |
Full Article |
Comprehensive reporting of research findings or literature reviews. | Original Research, Observational Study, Retrospective Study, Technical Report, Systematic Review, Literature Review, Scoping Review, Narrative Review, Case Series, Case Study | Review | -NA- | Editorial, Special Editorial, Opposite to the Editorial, Opinion, Perspective |
Short Article |
Concise presentation of research findings, reviews, or opinions. | Brief Research Report, Research Letter, Book Review, Mini Review, Case Report, Short type, Letter to the Editor (related to case study/series), Case Illustration, Commentary, Hypothesis, Short Communication, Opinion | -NA- | Case Report | Editorial, Letter to the Editor, Short Communication, Opinion |
Protocol Paper | Detailed description of research methodology for planned studies. | Research Protocols, Research Clinical Trials Protocol | -NA- | -NA- | -NA- |
Short Communication | Brief presentation of new ideas, preliminary findings, or case reports with limited data. | Research Letter | -NA- | Short type, Letter to the Editor (related to case study/series), Case Illustration |
Hypothesis, Short Communication, Illustrations, Announcements |
GUIDE TO MANUSCRIPT TYPES, REQUIREMENTS, AND KEY INFORMATION
Navigating manuscript submission is made easy with Openventio’s guide. It clarifies manuscript type selection, type of abstract selection, structure, figures/tables, length, and content highlights, ensuring a smooth preparation process.
Manuscript Type |
Abstract | Figures/Tables | Scope | Length |
Content Highlights |
Original Research |
Structured, 300 words |
Yes, 4-5 |
In-depth original data analysis, significant findings, and novel conclusions supported by robust statistical evidence. | 4-5000 words | – Introduction: Clearly state the research question and background.
– Materials and Methods: Describe methodology in detail, including materials, procedures, and statistical analysis. – Results: Present findings objectively and logically, with tables and figures for key data. – Discussion: Interpret results in the context of existing literature, address limitations, and draw conclusions. |
Brief Research Report | Structured, 250 words | Yes, 4 |
Preliminary findings from early-stage research or studies with limited data. |
2-2500 words |
– Introduction: Briefly state the research question and rationale for the study. – Materials and Methods: Summarize methodology, highlighting key procedures. – Results: Present pilot findings concisely, focusing on significant observations. – Discussion: Interpret results with caution, acknowledge limitations, and suggest future directions. |
Research Protocol | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 4 | Extensive details, justification, ethics | 2000 words | – Comprehensive plan for a research project, including justification, ethics considerations, and detailed methodology. |
Research Clinical Trial Protocol | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 2 | Follows ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines | 3500-4000 words | – Detailed plan for a clinical trial adhering to international ethical and scientific standards. |
Research Letter | No | Yes, 2 | Concise findings | 1200-1800 words | – Brief reports on original research, case studies, or significant new findings. |
Observational Study | Structured, 250-300 words | Yes, 2 | Complies with data, pre-informed participants | 3000 words | – Analysis of existing data collected from observational studies without experimental manipulation. |
Review | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 2 | Understandable language, significant references | 2500 words | – Critical evaluation of existing literature on a specific topic. |
Book Review | Unstructured, 100-250 words | May/May not include | Recent, relevant journal, details included | 1500-2000 words | – Critical evaluation of a recently published book related to the journal’s field. |
Mini Review | Unstructured, 200 words | Yes, 2 | Understandable language, necessary figures/tables | 1500-2000 words | – Concise and focused review of a specific topic within the journal’s scope. |
Systematic Review | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 4 | Detailed methodology, statistical tools, comparisons | 2500 words | – Comprehensive identification and analysis of all relevant primary research on a specific topic.
– Systematic search strategy, clear inclusion/exclusion criteria, and quality assessment of studies. – Detailed description of statistical methods used for data synthesis and meta-analysis (if applicable). – Critical evaluation of the findings, addressing potential biases and limitations. – Clear and concise presentation of results, highlighting key findings and implications for future research. |
Scoping Review | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 2 | Aims to map and summarize the existing evidence on a broad topic within the journal’s scope. | 2500 words | – Requires a structured abstract outlining the review objectives, search strategy, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
– Emphasizes detailed methodology, including database searches, reference management, and quality assessment of included studies. – Presents a clear overview of the identified studies, focusing on key themes, trends, and knowledge gaps. |
Case Report | Unstructured, 250 words | Yes, 2 | Original, unreported entity or new presentation | 2500 words with clinical/radiological/pathological images | – Description of a unique or previously unreported clinical case.
– Detailed presentation of clinical findings, including history, examination, investigations, and management. – Discussion of the differential diagnosis and potential underlying mechanisms. – Inclusion of relevant clinical/radiological/pathological images. |
Case Series | Unstructured, 250 words | Yes, depends on the number of cases presented | In similar cases, a comprehensive literature review | 2500 words with images | – Description of a series of similar cases with a specific condition or treatment.
– Comparison of individual cases, highlighting common features and variations. – Comprehensive review of existing literature on the topic. – Discussion of the clinical implications and potential future directions. – Inclusion of relevant clinical/radiological/pathological images. |
Technical Report | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 3 | Original data supporting technology development | 3000 words | – Description of a novel technology or innovation with potential applications.
– Clear explanation of the technical principles and underlying mechanisms. – Presentation of original data demonstrating the performance and effectiveness of the technology. – Discussion of the limitations and future development plans. |
Letter to the Editor | No | May/May not include | Supports/refutes/adds information to published work | 500-1000 words | – Comments on or critiques a previously published article in the journal.
– Provides additional information or alternative perspectives not covered in the original work. – Presents new data or arguments to support or refute the published findings. – Maintains a respectful and constructive tone. |
Editorial | Unstructured, 100 words | No | Precise, concluding arguments without sections | 500-1000 words | – Authoritative opinion piece on a topic relevant to the journal’s |
Commentary | No | Yes, 1 | Optional references | 1000-1500 words | – Can include personal opinions and interpretations, but should be evidence-based and objective. |
Hypothesis | Structured, 300 words | Yes, 2 | Testable and realistic, verifiable by statistics | 2500 words | – Requires a structured abstract for a concise summarization of the hypothesis and rationale. |
Opinion | No | Yes, 1 | Flexible format | 1500-2000 words | – Flexible format, allowing for personal perspectives and arguments. |
Perspective | No | Optional, 2 figures/tables | Similar to opinion, separate methods section, if detailed | 2500 words | – Can present novel interpretations or insights based on existing research. |
Short Communication | Unstructured, 250-300 words | Optional, 2 figures/tables | New ideas, controversies, negative results, suggestions | 1500-2000 words | – Unstructured format, allowing for concise presentations without extensive data or methods sections. |
Errata | No | Optional, 1 figure/table | Brief statements addressing errors and corrections | 500-800 words | – Provides a clear explanation of the mistake and its rectification. |
Illustrations | No | Yes, Clinical/diagnostic/investigative images | Brief history, case discussion, conclusion | 800-1000 words | – Requires a brief history of the case, case discussion, and concluding remarks contextualizing the images. |
Conference Proceedings | Structured, 250-300 words | Optional, 2 figures/tables | Presented papers from scientific conferences, symposia, or workshops | 500-1000 words (unpublished research) |
– Includes abstracts, full papers, or links to full reports for unpublished research |
Announcements | No | No | Conferences, workshops, seminars contact information, website details, etc | 500-1000 words | – Includes contact information, website details, and registration instructions for interested participants. |
OPENVENTIO’S MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION GUIDE
This guide provides essential information for preparing and submitting manuscripts to Openventio journals.
General principles:
MANUSCRIPT ELEMENTS
Mastering your manuscript’s structure is a breeze with Openventio’s detailed instructions. They break down each element, from the title page and abstract to methods, results, and discussion, guaranteeing a well-organized and impactful presentation.
Element |
Description |
Requirements |
Title |
Concise and informative, reflecting the main research question or finding. | No more than 25-28 words, avoid abbreviations and formulae if possible. |
Subtitle |
Amplifies the title & aids in information retrieval. | Briefly informs readers about the study focus. Doesn’t include key findings or conclusions. Maintains brevity and clarity. |
Authors’ List |
Signatures of contributors; listed according to academic contribution. | Includes 1-N authors with the highest academic credential(s) and affiliation(s). |
Author’s Affiliation |
Department(s), and Institution(s)/Universities of the author(s). | Mention ORCID ID, department, institution/university/organization, street address, city, state, zip code, country). |
Corresponding author |
Primary contact for readers and editors. | Name, credentials, designation, complete affiliation, email address, phone and fax. Indicate the corresponding author. |
Abstract |
Structured (except for Research Letters, Short Communications, and some others). | 300 words, summarizing the research question, methodology, key findings, and conclusions. |
Keywords |
Relevant to the research topic and facilitating search. | 3-5 keywords. |
Introduction |
Provides background and context for the research. | Clearly states the research question or hypothesis. |
Epigraphs |
Short thematic quote starting your article. | Italics, Flush left, Signature underneath, flush right, Reference in superscript (if cited), Otherwise, Author and title of work. |
Materials and Methods |
Describes the research methodology in detail. | Sufficient information for replication of the study. |
Results |
Presents the findings of the research. | Organized and clear presentation of data, analysis, and figures/tables. |
Discussion |
Interprets the results and their significance. | Addresses limitations and future research directions. |
Conclusion |
Summarize the main findings and their implications. | Concise and impactful statement. |
References |
Accurately cites all sources used in the manuscript. | Follow the journal’s preferred referencing style from the reference section below (AMA Manual of Style). |
Footnotes |
Used for URLs, affiliations, minor clarifications like the death of an author, etc. | Use superscript alphabets in text and corresponding numbers in footnote section |
Figures and Tables |
Supplement the text by presenting data visually. | Clearly labeled and numbered, with informative captions. The preferred file formats are TIFF, PNG, and JPEG with a high resolution of 300 dpi or higher. |
Figures/Tables Legend |
Conveys the topic of the tables and figures succinctly. | Brief, specific, and descriptive titles/legends are accepted. |
Figures/Tables Number |
Unique identifier for each figure/table. | Sequential numbering starts with 1. |
Data Sources |
Citation of original source(s) for the data if applicable | Follow the journal’s preferred citation style given in the reference section. |
Symbols and Abbreviation Key |
Explanation of symbols and abbreviations used in the figure/table | If necessary, define all symbols and abbreviations clearly. |
Addendum |
Supplementary information is not crucial to the main text. | Contains data, questionnaires, methods, and figures. Clearly label and organize addendum content. |
REFERENCES STYLE
Following the AMA Manual of Style, Openventio encourages authors to cite all sources employed in their manuscripts, encompassing both traditional (published print/online) and emerging (books, news, websites) publications. Citations should be numbered in the text to correspond with the “References” section, which must comprehensively list all cited sources and provide links to referenced tables/figures. The list of each category of reference is given below:
Reference Category | Format Example |
Notes |
Journal Reference |
Piven EF. Increasing adherence to the diabetes regimen: An occupational therapy perspective. Diabetes Res Open J. 2014; 1(1): e1-e2. | In case of more than 6 authors, provide the name of the first three authors followed by et al. If there is no author then start the references with the title. |
Journal Article (without volume/issue) | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, et al. Title. Journal short name. year: pp. | Use short name for journal. |
Journal Article (with volume/issue) | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, et al. Title. Journal short name. year; Vol(issue no.): pp-pp. | Specify volume and issue number after year. |
Part of an Issue | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, Author 4, Author 5, Author 6. Title. Journal short name. year; Vol(issue no, pt 3): pp-pp. | Indicate “pt” for part before page numbers. |
Complete Special/Theme Issue | Robert J, Stacey RA, eds. Blindness. Ophthalmol. 2016; Vol(3, theme/special issue): pp-pp. | Include editors and “theme/special issue” after volume. |
Supplement (numbered, no issue) | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, et al. Title. Journal short name. year; Vol(suppl 4): pp-pp. | Use “suppl” before supplement number. |
Supplement (numbered, with issue) | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, et al. Title. Journal short name. year; Vol(issue)(suppl 6): pp-pp. | Include issue number before “suppl”. |
Supplement (several parts) | Author1, Author 2, Author 3, et al. Title. Journal short name. year; Vol(issue)(suppl 6B): 17S-21S. | Specify part (e.g., 6B) after supplement number. |
Abstract from Source | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, et al. Title. [abstract taken from Arch Ophthamol. 2004; 122(1):55-56]. Journal short name. year; Vol(issue): pp-pp. | Include source of abstract in brackets before journal reference. |
Manuscript (accepted, not published) | Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, Author 4. Title. Journal short name. In press. | Specify “In press” if accepted but not published. |
Manuscript/Book (submitted, not accepted) | These findings have recently been demonstrated (H. E. Mumanan, MD, unpublished data, January 2015). | Use author/date format for unpublished data. |
Personal Communication | In a conversation with H. E. Murman, MD (August 2005)……. | Indicate type of communication (conversation, letter) and date. |
Entire Book | Modlin J, Jenkins P. Decision Analysis in Planning for a Polio Outbreak in the United States. San Francisco, CA, USA: Pediatric Academic Societies; 2004. | Include publisher location, publisher name and published year. |
Book Chapter | Solensky R. Drug allergy: desensitization and treatment of reactions to antibiotics and aspirin. In: Lockey P, ed. Allergens and Allergen Immunotherapy. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker; 2004: 585-606. | Indicate “ed(s)” for editor(s) before book title and edition number after title. |
Audiotape/Videotape/DVD | Moyer B. On Our Own terms: Moyers on Dying [Videotape]. New York, NY, USA: Thirteen/WNET; 2000. | Include type of media, publisher, and year. |
Thesis/Dissertation | Fenster FD. Cloning and Characterization of Piccolo, a Novel Component of the Presynaptic Cytoskeletal Matrix [dissertation]. Birmingham, England: University of Alabama; 2000. | Specify type of dissertation/thesis and institution. |
Package Insert | Cialis [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Eli Lilly & Co.; 2003. | Include product name and manufacturer. |
Online Conference Proceedings | Chu H, Rosenthal M. Search engines for the World Wide Web: A comparative study and evaluation methodology. Paper presented at: American Society for Information Science 1996 Annual Conference; October 19-24, 1996; Baltimore, MD, USA. http://www.asis.org/annual-96/electronicproceedings/chu.html. Accessed February 6, 2004. | Include title, conference details, URL, and access date. |
Newspaper (Print) | Wolfe W. State’s mail-order drug plan launched. Minneapolis Star Tribune. May 14, 2004: 1B. | Include newspaper name, date, and page number. |
Newspaper (Online) | Weiss R. The promise of precision prescriptions. Washington Post. June 24, 2000: A1. http://www.washingtonpost.com. Accessed October 24, 2011. | Include URL and access date for online version. |
Website | World Health Organization Media Center. Diabetes Fact Sheet. Web site. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/. 2013; Accessed February 21, 2014. | Include name/title of the website, URL and access date. |
Software | Epi Info [computer program]. Version 3.2. Atlanta, GA, USA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004. | Include the software name, version, location, company/institution. |
Government or Agency Bulletins | Same as a book reference | Same as a book reference |
Government Reports | Same as the website reference | Same as the website reference |
STYLE GUIDE: CRAFTING CLARITY AND CONSISTENCY
This section outlines essential stylistic guidelines for authors contributing to our publication. Adhering to these guidelines ensures clarity, consistency, and professional presentation throughout your manuscript.
Grammar
Punctuation
Capitalization
Numbers and Dates
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Define all abbreviations and acronyms upon first use, and use them consistently thereafter.
Non-English Elements
Italicize non-English words and phrases, and provide translations upon first use if necessary. Use appropriate accent marks.
Medical Indexes
Follow the AMA Manual of Style guide for referencing medical indexes and terminology.
TERMINOLOGY
Abbreviations & Acronyms:
UNITS OF MEASUREMENTS: ENSURING PRECISION AND CONSISTENCY
Openventio emphasizes the use of the International System of Units (SI) for reporting quantitative data within your manuscript. This standardized system promotes clarity and global understanding across diverse scientific disciplines. Here are some key principles to adhere to:
QUANTITATION: RIGOR AND CLARITY IN DATA PRESENTATION
Study Design and Statistics
Openventio prioritizes the transparency and accuracy of statistical methodology and data analysis within your manuscript. To ensure robust research findings and effective communication, adhere to the following guidelines:
Mathematical Composition
Openventio encourages the use of mathematical equations and formulas to enhance the precision and clarity of your manuscript. For consistent and professional presentation, follow these guidelines:
SUBMISSION
Contribute your research to our esteemed publication. Submit your manuscript electronically through our secure online portal, or send it via email to contact@openventio.org
Tips for successful submission:
Open Access: Accelerate Your Research Impact and Reach
Traditionally, scholarly research has been locked behind paywalls, limiting its reach and potential impact. The Gold open access model breaks down these barriers, making your research freely available to anyone, anywhere, regardless of their financial background or institutional affiliation. This translates to:
Invest in Your Research and Open Access
At Openventio Publishers, we believe in democratizing knowledge and empowering researchers like you. We follow the author-pay system, where a one-time article processing charge (APC) covers the essential costs associated with publishing your work:
Flexible Options and Affordability
Become a Champion of Open Access
Unlock Your Research Potential
Country Type
|
Research-based
|
Review-based
|
Case-based
|
Short type articles
|
High Income
|
USD 1079
|
USD 879
|
USD 779
|
USD 579
|
Middle Income
|
USD 779
|
USD 579
|
USD 479
|
USD 379
|
Low Income
|
USD 579
|
USD 379
|
USD 279
|
USD 179
|
Payment Options
Our payment options offer the authors the flexibility, security, and convenience of using our services anywhere and anytime. You can choose to pay via credit card or wire transfer.
Via Credit Card
We accept Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Diners Club, and Discover, and has partnered with a payment gateway for your convenience—PayPal. The payment gateway available to you will differ depending on your country and the card you choose to use.
Via Bank Transfer
You can make payments directly into our bank account and email the bank wire transfer receipt to us.
*Please note that payments made through bank transfer or check will be charged USD 50 extra.
Openventio’s Essential Guide To Research Integrity And Publication
Welcome to Openventio, a publisher dedicated to advancing scholarly knowledge through ethical research and publication practices. This guide serves as your comprehensive resource for navigating Openventio’s policies and procedures related to authorship, data sharing, ethical considerations, and more.
AUTHORSHIP
Understanding who deserves credit for a research work is crucial. Authorship at Openventio follows the ICMJE’s four criteria:
Additional responsibilities of authors include disclosing conflicts of interest, obtaining permission from acknowledged individuals, and ensuring data access for original research. Openventio encourages transparency and best practices throughout the authorship process, emphasizing clear discussion and documentation of contributions from the outset.
Group and Collaborative Authorship
What is it? Group authorship involves multiple contributors to a research project, often from different institutions or disciplines. Examples include multicenter studies, working groups, and expert committees. These collaborations can be complex and involve hundreds of participants.
Challenges
Options for Listing Authors on Openventio: A Quick Guide
Openventio provides clear guidelines for author attribution based on group size and contribution levels. Below is the simplified breakdown:
Scenario | Byline | Acknowledgment | Explanation |
Small group (up to 4 authors) | All authors listed individually | N/A | Each author meets all authorship criteria. |
Medium group (5-15 authors) | All authors listed individually | Optional for non-authors | Some may prefer shorter bylines; non-aut |