1. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies: How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med. 1998; 43(10): 877-887. Website. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/9800671. Accessed June 12, 2016
2. Zhang Y, Zhao YY, Qiao J. Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123(4): 418-422. Website. http://124.205.33.103:81/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=201022059246370&flag=1. Accessed June 12, 2016
3. Wilson TM. Retained placenta incarcerated in the rudimentary horn of a double uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955; 70(3): 669- 671. Website. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13238517. Accessed June 12, 2016
4. Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J, Spinnato JA. Abnormal placentation: Evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accrete, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012; 67(8): 503-519. doi: 10. 1097/OGX. Ob013e3182685870
5. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(10): 2277-2281. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2277
6. Ma S, Bian X, Lang J. Pregnancy and its outcome in women with malformed uterus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001; 81(7): 415-417. Website. http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/11798909. Accessed June 12, 2016
7. Hiersch L, Yeoshoua E, Miremberg H, et al. The association between mullerian anomalies and short-term pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(16): 2573-2578. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1098613
8. Hua M, Odibo AO, Longman RE, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(6): 558.e1-558.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.022
9. Pal K, Majumdar S, Mukhopadhyay S. Rupture of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy at 37 weeks geststion with fetal survival. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274(5): 325-326. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0170-y
10. Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with mullerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 19(3): 229-237. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32814b0649