The Skinny on Moisturizers: A Brief Report

*Corresponding author: Sreeja R. Kuppam*
This work is done by a high school student and we are publishing this as it fits into our mission of promoting and encouraging studies in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) field for our next generation. – Editor-in-Chief, DRMTOJ

Full-Text PDF:

brief report

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of 5 different skin moisturizers using JELL-O® as a model for the human skin.

Methods

In this study five different moisturizers (Equate®, Burt’s Bees®, Suave®, Aveeno® and Vaseline®) were applied to equivalent samples of JELL-O®. Observations were made over a 12-day period and data was collected at 15 different time intervals. The primary outcome was the height (cm) and weight (g) of the JELL-O® sample at each time interval. The study was an ex vivo experiment conducted in a home laboratory. No Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was required since the research does not involve living organisms.

Results

Overall, the JELL-O® sample that had the Vaseline® applied on it had the lowest loss of height and weight. The height stayed at 100% of its original value and the weight only decreased to 97.2% of the original value by the end of the observation period. In contrast, the sample which had Suave® applied to the surface its height and weight decrease the most (42% and 28% respectively). The other moisturizers had effects intermediate between these two extremes.

Conclusion

Based on this ex vivo head to head study using JELL-O® as a model for the human skin the 5 moisturizers examined had widely differing levels of effectiveness with Vaseline® appearing to be the most protective against evaporative losses and Suave® appearing to be the least.

Keywords

Moisturizers; Dry skin; Different moisturizers; Skin lotions; Vaseline® effectiveness.