Pulmonary Research and Respiratory Medicine

Open journal

ISSN 2377-1658

Pulmonary Complications in Patients with Brain Injury

José Manuel López Alvarez* , Olivia Perez Quevedo, Laura Roldan Furelos, Ion Santacana González, Eduardo Consuegra Llapur, Monica Elena Lemaur Valeron and Jorge Rafael Gonzalez

José Manuel López Alvarez, PhD

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil de, Francisco Gourié nº28- 5º E, 35002 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Tel. +34616246110; E-mail: jmloal@hotmail.com

INTRODUCTION

The severity of brain injury is the main determinant of morbidity and mortality in neurocritical patients. However, the role of other associated extracranial complications should not be disregarded1 with pulmonary complications being among the most common ones (Figure 1).2 Major respiratory complications associated with injury to the Central Nervous System (CNS) are caused by airways dysfunction (inability to maintain passage due to neurologic depression or damage), respiratory muscles dysfunction (nerve injury) or intrinsic pulmonary disorders (infection, embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome, etc.). The occurrence of such complications could potentially cause hypoxemia, which would secondarily aggravate the brain damage. This situation is known to account for up to 50% deaths resulting from brain injury and is considered to be an independent factor for mortality.1,3,4,5,6,7,8

 

Figure 1: Extracerebral complications in neurocritics patient.

PRRMOJ-2-110 Fig 1

VAP: Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia; ALI: Acute Lung Injury; ARSD: Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The objective of the present article was to offer an up to date review of theories and available evidence on relation between the cerebral alterations and the interactions to pulmonary level.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

The interaction between the CNS and the respiratory system is evidenced at the physiological level since the respiratory center, located in the brain stem, controls involuntary respiratory activity and a second, less defined, center in the brain controls for the voluntary respiratory activity.

The ventilatory activity of airways and chest muscles is triggered by spinal cord and carotid sinuses, which are in turn stimulated by CO2 and Hydrogen ion [H+] concentrations. Carotid sinuses also respond to changes in PaO2. Current theories proposed to explain the pathophysiological mechanisms of respiratory complications in case of brain injury are summarized as follows (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2: Pathophysiology of lung complications in patients with brain injury.

PRRMOJ-2-110 Fig 2

 

Sympathetic Storm

When brain injury occurs, an initial sympathetic discharge elevates plasmatic adrenaline levels to about 1200 times the normal value within seconds. Although the level of adrenaline subsequently falls, it keeps 3 times higher than normal for about ten days.2,3,7,9,10 This catecholamine release elevates intravascular pressure thus damaging the endothelium and producing pulmonary edema due to disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier. The initial hydrostatic edema becomes a protein-rich edema that goes into interstitial and alveolar spaces.3,7,9,10 The amount of fluid that leaks through the endothelium depends on the severity of capillary hypertension. Furthermore, in case of structural damage to the capillary wall, plasma will pass to the interstitial and alveolar spaces. The medulla oblongata is considered to be the key anatomical structure directly involved in this pathophysiological response; experiments demonstrated that bilateral lesions to this structure cause systemic hypertension and lung injury.11 Additionally, the possible involvement of the hypothalamus (dysfunction of the vasomotor center), elevated Intracranial pressure (ICP) or activation of the sympathetic-adrenal system have also been studied.11

Inflammatory Theory

As part of the inflammatory response to acute brain injury, intracranial production of cytokines may increase and the permeability of the blood-brain barrier may be higher. The resulting transcranial release of pro-inflammatory cytokines could cause migration of neutrophils and activation of macrophages in the alveolar spaces, as well as structural damage to type II pneumocytes, thus producing secondary lung damage.12,13,14,15,16,17,18

Double Injury Theory (Double Hit Model)

Brain injury would produce a systemic inflammatory response, which would increase vulnerability to inflammatory processes well tolerated in normal situations, such as infection, mechanical stress from artificial ventilation or surgical procedures. Such inflammatory processes could in turn worsen the initial brain damage, harm distant organs and cause multiorgan dysfunction.19,20,21,22,23

After severe brain injury, respiratory failure is the commonest associated dysfunction. In such cases, pathophysiological processes to be considered are: preclinical lung injury, altered capillary permeability with activated neutrophils and macrophages migrating into the airways and alveolar spaces, increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage and damage to type II pneumocytes – characterized by intense cell vacuolation and lipid peroxidation of lung tissue that causes lysis of the cell membranes. All of this would make lungs more susceptible to secondary damage (“double lesion model”) that could result from initial trauma, respiratory strategy, infection, transfusion, etc.19,20,21,22,23

These experimental and clinical data support the hypothesis that after severe brain injury eventually leading to brain death, preclinical lung injury occurs. The catecholamine storm and the systemic production of inflammatory mediators create a systemic inflammatory environment where the lung is more susceptible to further injurious stimuli, such as ventilatory settings, infections, and transfusions.

CLINICAL PICTURE

Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema (NPE)

Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema is a complication of severe CNS injury that develops early after trauma in the absence of prior cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction. It was first described in 1908 by Shanahan,24 who reported the finding of pulmonary edema in 11 patients with epilepsy. It is occasionally classified as a type of acute respiratory distress, although its pathophysiology and prognosis are different (Table 1). Its severity is related to the magnitude of the brain injury and it is associated with high morbidity rates and up to 7% mortality.8,10,25 NPE may be triggered by different brain conditions, including seizures, stroke and traumatic brain injury (Figure 3). NPE is most common in seizures during the post-critical period, affecting to up to one third of patients in status epilepticus.26,27

 

Table 1: Pathophysiology types of lung edema.
↑ Hydrostatic
Pressure
↑ Permeability
Cardiogenic pulmonary

edema

++++

Reexpansion pulmonary

edema

++++ ++
Neonatal respiratory

distress syndrome

++ ++++

Neurogenic pulmonary

edema

++++ ++++
High altitude pulmonary

edema

++++ ++

Adult respiratory distress

syndrome / Acute lung injury

++++
Negative pressure

pulmonary edema

++++ ++++

 

Figure 3: Neurogenic pulmonary edema associated with intracelebral homorrhage.

PRRMOJ-2-110 Fig 3

 

Among patients with brain hemorrhage, NPE mostly occurs in those with Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from ruptured aneurysms and is correlated with the clinical and radiological severity of bleeding.24,25,26

 In head injury the development of pulmonary edema associated with intracranial hypertension %), although not necessary, with a lower incidence (around 1%).26 Clinical presentation of NPE typically comprises early onset and rapid development during the first few hours or days after brain injury; it usually resolves within 24-48 hours. Its most common symptom is dyspnea, accompanied by tachypnea, tachycardia, and crackles at baseline. It should be diagnosed in the presence of pulmonary edema and after excluding other possible causes. NPE diagnosis is different from that of other types of pulmonary edema (Table 1).

Changes in the Ventilation/Perfusion Ratio

Described in neurocritical patients with hypoxemia in the absence of pulmonary infiltrate (clinical-X ray dissociation), probably related to an alteration in the ventilation/perfusion ratio. It is caused by redistribution of regional perfusion, pulmonary microembolism with increased dead space and removal of pulmonary surfactants due to excessive sympathetic stimulation and hyperventilation.

Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The occurrence and severity of Acute Lung Injury (ALI) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in patients with severe brain damage mainly depend on: the systemic inflammatory response associated with the release of mediators (cytokines, interleukins, tissue factors, etc.),14,15,16,17,18 the massive release of catecholamines into the bloodstream resulting from brain damage and the resuscitation maneuvers that have been used.3,10 All of this increases lung capillary permeability and results in bilateral pulmonary infiltrates that lead to severe hypoxemia with a low PaO2/FiO2 ratio (<300 mm Hg in ALI, <200 mm Hg in ARDS) and decreased lung compliance.

ALI/ARDS occurs in between 20-25% of patients with severe brain damage and constitutes an independent risk factor that worsens prognosis and increases mortality in these patients. Although direct correlation with the CT-scan images of lesions has not been demonstrated, evidence indicates that patients with the larger, more severe brain injury (larger evacuated mass or displacements from midline) are at 5 to 10 times higher risk of developing ALI.3,7

ALI/ARDS develops relatively soon with an initial peak 2-3 days after starting mechanical ventilation or late at the week.

Risk factors for developing ALI/ARDS include: structural damage observable in initial brain CT-scan study, early detection of low Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), use of vasoactive drugs and history of drug addiction.3,7,28

Pneumonia Associated with Mechanical Ventilation

Mechanical Ventilation-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is defined as pneumonia developed 48-72 hours after intubation. Many patients with severe brain damage require artificial respiratory support, often prolonged, with the consequent risk of lung infection and prolonged stay in the Intensive Care Unit. The incidence of VAP is 9-27% of all intubated patients and increases with the duration of mechanical ventilation. It is even higher in neurocritical patients, where variable incidence rates oscillate between 30% and 50%.29 VAP mostly appears during the first 4 days. The most commonly involved pathogens are: Pseudomona aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter, although in patients with head trauma Staphylococcus aureus is the most common one.30 Independent risk factors for the development of VAP are: low level of consciousness, aspiration, emergency intubation, mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days, reintubation, age over 60 years, supine position, comorbidities and previous antibiotic therapy.30

Mortality rates attributed to VAP are about 30%; this condition doubles the risk of death. It is also estimated to increases the duration of stay at the ICU in 6 days and the associated expenses in 10,000 dollars.30

Mechanical ventilation is the main supportive therapy used to re-establish sufficient oxygen supply and remove Carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by peripheral organs during acute respiratory failure in patients with severe brain injury. While tight CO2 control represents a priority in patients with severe brain injury, optimal treatment of ALI/ARDS consists of a protective ventilatory strategy allowing a certain degree of hypercapnia to protect the lung from further injurious stimuli while it recovers from the initial pathological process.

All these findings support the hypothesis that, after severe brain injury eventually leading to brain death, a preclinical lung injury characterized by an inflammatory response is present. Massive brain injury may act as a preconditioning factor rendering the lung more susceptible to subsequent lung damage induced by mechanical ventilation.

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS

Associated with Brain Injury

Management of Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema (NPE)

Neurocritical patients with impaired respiratory function or signs of low cardiac output require strict hemodynamic and echocardiographic monitoring. These patients may potentially need a pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz). Fluid restriction as normal filling pressure is reached and use beta blockers to reduce oxygen consumption (VO2) may be necessary to improve lung and brain function. Vasopressor agents should be used rationally to avoid possible vasoconstriction of pulmonary vessels or worsening of lung injury due to hemodynamic stress. Respiratory support with supplemental oxygen should be provided with the aim of maintaining SaO2> 94%. Mechanical ventilation should be indicated if necessary.27 The respiratory strategy should include alveolar recruitment and protection in order to avoid ventilation-induced injury (see below).

Prevention of Collapse /Atelectasis in Decline Areas

Mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 6 ml/kg, plateau pressure less than 30 cm H2O and PEEP less than 15 cm H2O ensures homogenization of pulmonary ventilation preventing lung collapse that avoid hemodynamic variations which impact on Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP). It has been shown that use of high tidal volumes (9-11 ml/kg) stimulates inflammatory response and lung injury induced by the ventilator.10,25,31,32

Even neurocritical patient’s ventilation in prone possition results in improved brain tissue oxygenation in severe hypoxemia with minimal effect on Intracranial pressure (ICP) and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP).25,33,34,35,36

Prevention of Mechanical Ventilation-Associated

Pneumonia

Prolonged respiratory support should be avoided; mechanical ventilation should be discontinued as soon as possible.32,34However, in cases of neurocritical disease prompted, patients that require high doses of sedatives or failure to protect the airways (alteration of respiratory center, damage to the nuclei of cranial nerves or ARDS), a tracheostomy may improve patient’s comfort and management of tracheobronchial secretions (Table 2), as well as early onset of chest physiotherapy.36

 

Table 2: Indications for tracheostomy in neurocritic patients.

  • Neurologic stability
  • Normal Intracraneal pressure
  • Weaning posibility
  • Pronlonged alteration of consciousness
  • Imposibility to protect airways
  • Easier management of pulmonary secretions
  • Obstruction of airways 

 

Prophylactic antibiotic therapy against multiresistant pathogens is usually started until the microbiology laboratory results are available. The treatment usually lasts for 7 days if the patient progresses favourably; although it might be extended in patients where Pseudomonas aeruginosa is identified since infection by this organism is associated with high rates of relapse.37

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe brain damage, respiratory complications are frequent. Increasing our knowledge of the pathophysiologic mechanisms triggering this situation is essential to enhance prevention and treatment. Key elements to be highlighted include worsening of brain injury secondary to hypoxia and lung damage, and aggravation of lung injury due to inadequate respiratory strategy.

1. Pelosi P, Servergnini P, Chiranda M. An integrated approach to prevent and treat respiratory failure in brain-injured patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005; 11(1): 37-42. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200502000-00006

2. Schirme-Mikalsen K, Vik A, Gisvold SE, Skandsen T, Hynne H, Klepstad P. Severe head injury: control of physiological variables, organ failure and complications in the intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007; 51: 1194-1201. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01372.x

3. Bratton SL, Davis RL. Acute lung injury in isolated traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40(4): 707-712. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199704000-00009

4. Contant CF, Valadka AB, Gopinath SP, Hannay HJ, Robertson CS. Adult respiratory distress syndrome: a complication of induced hypertension after severe head injury. J. Neurosurg. 2001; 95(4): 560-568. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0560

5. Bronchard R, Albaladejo P, Breza G, et al. Early onset pneumonia. Risk factors and consequences in head trauma patients. Anestesiology. 2004; 100(2): 234-239. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00009

6. Mascia L, Mastromauro I, Viberti S. High tidal volume as a predictor of acute luna injury in neurotrama patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008; 74(6): 325-327.

7. Holland MC, Mackersie RC, Morabito D, et al. The development of acute lung injury is associated with worse neurological outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2003; 55(1): 106-111. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000071620.27375.be

8. Oddo M, Nuom E, Frangos S, et al. Acute lung injury is an independent risk factor for brain hipoxia after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67: 338-344. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000371979.48809.D9

9. Solenski NJ, Haley EC, Kassell NF, et al. Medical complications of aneurismal subaracnoid hemorrage. A report of the multicenter, cooperative aneurysm study. Participant of the Multicenter Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23(6): 1007-1017. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199506000-00004

10. Mascia L. Acute lung injury in patients with severe brain injury: A double hit model. Neurocrit Care. 2009; 11: 417-426. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9242-8

11. Chen HI, Sun SC, Chai CY. Pulmonary Edema and Hemorrhage Resulting from Cerebral Compresión. Am J Phisiol. 1973; 224(2): 223-229. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1973.224.2.223

12. Avlonitis VS, Fisher AJ, Kirby JA, Dark JH. Pulmonary transplantation: the role of brain death in donor lung injury. Transplantion. 2003; 75(12): 1928-1933. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000066351.87480.9E

13. Lucas SM, Rothwell NJ, Gibson RM. The role of inflammation in CNS injury and disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2006; 147(Suppl 1): S232-S240. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706400

14. Ott L, McClain CJ, Gillespie M, Young B. Cytokines and metabolic dysfunction after severe head injury. J Neurotrauma. 1994; 11: 447-472. doi: 10.1089/neu.1994.11.447

15. McKeating EG, Andrews PJ, Signorini DF, Mascia L. Transcranial cytokine gradients in patients requiring intensive care after acute brain iinjury. Br JAnaesth. 1997; 78(5): 520-523. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.520

16. Hutchinson PJ, ÒConnell MT, Rothwell NJ, et al. Inflamation in human brain injury. Intracerebral concentrations of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and their endogenous inhibitor IL-1ra. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24(10): 1545-1557. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0295

17. Kelley BJ, Lifshitz J, Povlishock JT. Neuroinflamatory responses after experimental diffuse traumatic brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007; 66(11): 989-1001. doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e3181588245

18. Fremont R, Koyama T, Calfee C, et al. Acute lung injury in patient s with traumatic injuries: Utility of a panel of biomarkers for diagnosis and pathogenesis. J. Trauma. 2010; 68: 1121-1127. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40728

19. Scholz M, Cinatl J, Schädel-höpfner M, Windolff J. Neutrophils and blood-brain barrier dysfunction after trauma. Med Res rev. 2007; 27(3): 401-416. doi: 10.1002/med.20064

20. LópezAguilar J, Villagrá A, Bernabé F, et al. Massive brain injury enhances lung damage in an isolated lung modelof ventilador-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33: 1077-1083. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000162913.72479.f7

21. Kalsotra A, Zhao J, Anakk S, Dash PK, Strobel HW. Brain trauma leads to enhanced lung inflammation and injury: evidence for role of P4504Fs in resolution. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007; 27: 963-974. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600396

22. Yildirim E, Kaptanoglu E, Ozisik K, et al. Ultraestructural cahnges in pneumocytes type II cells following traumatics brain injury in rats. Eur J Cardiothorac surg. 2004; 25: 523-552. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.12.021

23. Fisher AJ, Donnelly SC Hirani N, et al. Enhanced pulmonary inflammation in organ donors following fatal nontraumatic brain injury. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1412-1413. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00494-8

24. Shanahan WT. Pulmonary edema in epilepsy. NY Med. 1908; 87: 54-56.

25. Mascia L, Zabala E, Bosma K, et al. High tidal volumen is associated with the development of acute lung injury alter severe brain injury: An International observational study. Crit Care med. 2007; 35(8): 1815-1820. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000275269.77467.df

26. Brambrink AM, Dick WF. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Pathogenesis, clinical picture and therapy. Anaesthesist. 1997; 46: 953-963. doi: 10.1007/s001010050492

27. Carrillo Esper R, Castro Padilla F, Leal Gaxiola P, Carrillo Córdoba JR, Carrillo Córdoba LD. Up to date in Neurological Intensive therapy. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int. 2010; 24(2): 59-65.

28. Wasowska-Krolikowska K, Krogulska A, Modzelewska-Holynska M. Neurogenic pulmonary oedema in a 13-year-old boy in the course of symptomatic epilepsy. Med Sci Monit. 2000; 6(5): 1003-1007.

29. Hernández Medina E, Pérez Quevedo O, Valerón Lemaur M, López Alvarez JM. Pulmonary edema recidivant in patient with hemorrhage intracraneal. About a case. Med Intensiva. 2009; 33(3): 148-150. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5691(09)70949-0

30. Fulton R, Jones C. The cause of post traumatic pulmonary insuffiency in man. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975; 140: 179-186.

31. Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, et al. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2588-2598. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2588

32. Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilador-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(10): 2184-2193. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181731.53912.d9

33. Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, et al. Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the Honest of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32: 1817-1824. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000133019.52531.30

34. Belda FJ, Aguilar G, Soro M, Maruenda A. Ventilatory Management of the severely brain-injured patient. Rev esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2004; 51: 143-150.

35. Beuret P, Carton MJ, Nourdine K, et al. Prone position as prevention of lung injury in comatose patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28(5): 564-569. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1266-x

36. Mancebo J, Fernández R, Blanch L, et al. A multicenter trial of prolongad prone ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173(11): 1233-1239. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200503-353OC

37. Mascia L, Corno E, Terragni PP, Stather D, Ferguson ND. Pro/con clinical debate: tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment. Crit Care. 2004; 8(5): 327-330. doi: 10.1186%2Fcc2864

LATEST ARTICLES

Unraveling the Mysteries of Type-A Aortic Dissection Using POCUS/Echocardiography

Syeda Rukh*, Sathyanarayana Machani and Milind Awale

doi.

Blood Sample from the Patient

Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Pancreatitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Maarten Bulterys, Melvin Willems* and Agnes Meersman

doi.

From Neck Pain to a Life-Threatening Condition: A Case Report

Floris Vandewoude* and Sören Verstraete

doi.

LATEST ARTICLES