Organic Foods and Public Health Importance: A Review

Haben Fesseha* and Saliman Aliye

Corresponding Author

Haben Fesseha, MVSc, DVM

Assistant Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, P. O. Box 138, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia; Tel. +251910737790; E-mail:


Haben Fesseha, MVSc, DVM1*; Saliman Aliye, MVSc, DVM2

1Department of Veterinary Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, P. O. Box 138, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia

2Department of Veterinary Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, P. O. Box 138, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia

Corresponding Author

Haben Fesseha, MVSc, DVM

Assistant Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, P. O. Box 138, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia; Tel. +251910737790; E-mail:

Article History

Received: December 3rd, 2019; Revised: December 23rd, 2019; Accepted: December 30th, 2019; Published: January 2nd, 2020

Cite this Article

Fesseha H, Aliye S. Organic foods and public health importance: A review. Vet Med Open J. 2020; 5(1): 1-8. doi: 10.17140/VMOJ-5-140


©2020 by Fesseha H. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited



Organic livestock farming is a useful strategy to overcome the challenges of the agricultural sector like sustainability, food security, and food safety while matching with a high status of animal welfare, care for the environment, restricted use of medical drugs, growth promoters, synthetic fertilizer and the production of healthy food products without drug residues. Furthermore, organic livestock farming could also be an interesting strategy for the eternal rural development issue and solution for the farms’ decreasing profitability. The regulation of organic animal production is comprehensive and affected by different aspects such as feeding, housing, breeding, health care, and medical treatment. In contrast to conventional production systems, animals under organic livestock production are allowed a larger housing area, have obligatory straw bedding, fed organic feed, and roughage. The animal feed is a strong determinant of the fatty acid composition of the milk, egg or meat. In relation to animal health and welfare, the application of breed selection, good management, nutrition, and husbandry plays a greater role in disease prevention and good animal welfare. Now-a-days, antimicrobial resistance is a global public health issue and a threat to the modern health care system which is recognized by many international health organizations. Accordingly, over the last few years, the demand for organic products and availability in the market has been increased and made significant development in the economy. Several people have started to consider organic food instead of conventional food because it is healthier and less prone to the impact of chemical residues. Consequently, awareness creation and encouraging the importance of organic products for customers is important for the development of organic production.


Organic agriculture is a farming system which had been followed by farmers from ancient times, and free from the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, growth regulators and livestock feed additives. According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), it is an integrated production management system which promotes and enhances agro-ecosystem health, including biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity.1,2

Organic farming can be distinguished from conventional agriculture by exercising particular respect for human values, the environment, nature, and animal welfare, etc. The basic principles of organic farming, as formulated by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) need to be incorporated. The processing of organic food aims to maintain nutritional value and limit the number and quantity of additives and processing aids in food products.3,4,5

A risk to human health from antibiotic resistance developing in micro-organisms is one of the major public health threats that will be faced in the 21st century. In spite of these concerns, antibiotics are still used widely by non-organic livestock farmers as growth promoters or for disease suppression by routinely adding them to feed and water. The routine uses of antibiotics to curb disease outbreaks or promote growth are prohibited in organic standards. Instead, disease outbreaks are minimized by the avoidance of dense stocking levels or intensive housing and the promotion of positive animal health through good husbandry and free-range conditions. The veterinary use of antibiotics has been minimized and strictly controlled, and withdrawal periods after administration of a veterinary drug are stricter than those recommended in order to prevent detectable residues in meat or milk.6,7

Pesticide residues have been, known to exert carcinogenic, genotoxic, neuro-destructive, endocrine and allergenic effects and found usually in higher contents in conventionally produced foods. There is scientific evidence that dietary exposure of children to organophosphorus pesticides, measured on the basis of the level of pesticide metabolites in urine samples, is much lower on organic than on conventional diet.8,9

Now-a-days, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a great concern to the world. The consequences of antimicrobial resistance include the failure to successfully treat infections, leading to increased mortality; more severe or prolonged illness; production losses; and reduced livelihoods and food security. The indirect impacts of AMR include higher costs for treatment and health care. The health consequences and economic costs of AMR are estimated at 10 million human fatalities annually and a 2 to 3.5% decrease in global gross domestic product (GDP) or United States Dollar (USD) 100 trillion, by 2050. But the true cost of AMR is hard to predict.10,11

Antimicrobial use in animals for growth promotion, prophylaxis, and metaphylaxis (i.e. medicating mixed groups of healthy and infected animals in order to control outbreaks of disease) has been substantially reduced in high-income countries in recent years, however, livestock antimicrobial use will continue to increase in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) during the next decades due to the growing demand in LMICs for animal protein that it is contributing to increasing antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria.12,13

There is strong evidence that poultry and livestock that consume animal feeds and pastures grown using organic methods produce meat, milk, and eggs that has modestly higher levels of protein, more of some vitamins and minerals, and elevated levels of heart-healthy n-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA).3,14


Organic farming and sustainable agriculture are synonymous because they both depend on the sustainability of agro-ecological systems. Sustainability can be defined as meeting the need of the present without compromising the ability of future generations.15,16

Organic farming consumes less energy and at the present, when the world is focused on the energy crisis, organic agriculture achieves lower energy consumption rates because, it does not apply fertilizers and pesticides, whose production requires high energy inputs. In addition, high energy lead to large emissions of greenhouse gases and conventional farming is a very large emission source of them. Therefore, organic plant production significantly contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, conventional agriculture leads to eutrophication and pollution of water resources by the use of pesticides.7,17 Body fluids i.e. urine and blood of children on conventional diet contained six times more pesticide residues than children on an organic diet.18,19

Animal Management

Organic farming and sustainable agriculture are synonymous because they both depend on the sustainability of agro-ecological systems. Sustainability can be defined as meeting the need of the present without compromising the ability of future generations.15,16

Organic farming consumes less energy and at the present, when the world is focused on the energy crisis, organic agriculture achieves lower energy consumption rates because, it does not apply fertilizers and pesticides, whose production requires high energy inputs. In addition, high energy lead to large emissions of greenhouse gases and conventional farming is a very large emission source of them. Therefore, organic plant production significantly contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, conventional agriculture leads to eutrophication and pollution of water resources by the use of pesticides.7,17 Body fluids i.e. urine and blood of children on conventional diet contained six times more pesticide residues than children on an organic diet.18,19

The standards for organic livestock farming offer a good framework for animal health and welfare management. In these fields, it is still necessary to solve certain grey areas among the organic farming objectives. Animals feed grown organically showed better for growth and reproduction than animal feed grown conventionally.4,20 The main advantage of organic food production is the restricted use of synthetic pesticides which leads to low residue levels in foods and thus lower pesticide exposure for consumers. It also reduces the occupational exposure of farmworkers to pesticides.3,21


Organic livestock husbandry requires that a large fraction of the feed should be locally produced. While soy, palm kernel cake, cereals, and maize silage are substantial feed fractions in many conventional livestock systems, they are less used ingredients in organic systems. On the other hand, grass-clover hay and other roughage make up a larger portion of the feed-in organic than in conventional systems. There is a well-established link between the fatty acid composition of the feed, and the fatty acid composition in the product (meat, milk, eggs,). Outstandingly, soy, palm kernel cereals, and maize have a low content of omega-3 fatty acids, while grass and red clover are rich sources of omega-3 fatty acids.8,22

Nutrition affects the immune status of animals and humans. Accordingly, nutrients play a great role in optimum immune response. However, deficient and excessive intakes can have negative consequences for the immune status and the susceptibility to a variety of pathogens.15,23,24


The housing conditions and the access to straw bedding used in organic animal farming might lead to the conclusion that the animals would be less stressed than conventionally kept animals; therefore, stress affects the immune response of both humans and animals.25,26,27


In organic livestock production, the principle for disease prevention is preferably based on the selection of the appropriate breeds or strains of animals. There are a number of breeding strategies for improved disease resistance in organic livestock production. These include (1) the recording of disease incidence in the progeny and the selection of parents that produce progeny with the lowest incidences, (2) the use of breeds possessing certain major histocompatibility-complex antigens known to be associated with resistance to certain infections, and (3) the identification of a set or combination of immune parameters crucial for resistance to infections and using parameters with high heritability in breeding programs.28,29,30

Health care:

Organic livestock production requires producers to establish preventive health care practices. These practices include: selecting the appropriate type and species of livestock, providing adequate feed, creating an appropriate environment that minimizes stress, disease, and parasites, administering vaccines and veterinary biologics. Besides, the animal husbandry practices should promote animal well-being in a manner that minimizes pain and stress. Producers cannot provide preventive antibiotics rather they are encouraged to treat animals with appropriate protocols, including antibiotics and other conventional medicines when needed, but these treated animals cannot be sold or labeled as organic. Producers cannot administer hormones or other drugs for growth promotion.29,31,32,33

Quality of Organic Animal Food

Under organic farms, consumers expect quality organic products including milk, meat, eggs, leather products to come from farms. Besides, farms that are verified and meet rigorous standards have the mandate to use organic feed, prohibit the use of prophylactic antibiotics (except in medical emergencies) and give animals access to the outdoors, fresh air and sunlight. Production methods are based on criteria that meet all health regulations, work in harmony with the environment, build biological diversity and foster healthy soil and growing conditions. Animals are marketed as having been raised without the use of persistent toxic pesticides and antibiotics.3,29,34

Comparison between Organic and Conventional Animal Food

Food products that are produced under organic farming are more nutritious and safer than conventional foods. Even though some studies indicated that organic foods have lower pesticide residues compared to conventional foods, they cannot be defined as pesticide-free.3,24,35

Organic farming uses more ‘natural’ methods and differs from conventional farming in a number of ways although the difference in the actual practices of both cultivation systems can vary substantially between different countries/regions. In conventional plant production, inorganic fertilizers (NPK) are used to increase the yield, and pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides are used for pest and weed control. Organic farming use growing intercrops or cover crops, use organic wastes and compost, crop rotation and biofertilizers to keep and build good soil structure and fertility to supply nutrients the plant.36,37

Organic foods of animal origin are derived from animals fed on 100% organic food for at least 12-months. The use of antibiotics, synthetic growth promoters, genetically engineered vaccines is prohibited.13,38

Currently, most research focus on compositional differences of organic and conventional animal-based foods is on the fatty acid composition, with a major interest in omega-3 fatty acids due to their importance for human health.39 Some studies also address the content of minerals and vitamins in organic and conventional livestock products. The fatty acid composition of the milk, egg or meat is mainly determined by the fatty acid composition of the feed. Roughage feeds especially grass and red clover, contain between 30% and 50% omega-3 fatty acid of total fatty acid, while the concentrate feeds such as cereals, soy, corn, and palm kernel cake have less than 10% omega-3 fatty acid of total fatty acid.5,40


Milk is one of the most important nutritional sources, especially in the nutrition of children. It is reported that the composition of organic milk compared to conventional milk from high input systems can be very different, especially while comparing the antioxidant and the fatty acid profile. Organic milk has a higher content of CLA, n-3 fatty acids and a better n-6/n-3 fatty acids ratio.41 Factors for beneficial milk fatty acids composition are outdoor grazing, high biodiversity in pastures, low-levels of concentrates and no silage feeding (except red clover).1,42,43


Meat (beef, pork, and lamb) from the organically raised animals are generally characterized by a lower content of total fat. At the same time, organic pork and lamb were found to present higher intramuscular fat content44-46 and it contains usually more unsaturated and less saturated fatty acids. Moreover, the n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio in organic beef was reported to be much lower comparing to the conventional beef, higher weight of breast and thigh muscles in poultry carcasses.18,28

In most cases, organic meat has also better nutritional quality than conventional meat. Organic lamb was found to present better eating quality than conventional lamb in terms of juiciness (attributed to the higher intramuscular fat content) and flavor (attributed to the higher level of linolenic acid and total n-3 fatty acids). Meat derived from organic farming perform desirable nutritional properties, such as favorable ratios of fatty acids. Since it has the lower content of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids and a lower ratio of n-6 fatty acids to n-3 fatty acids (Table 1).47

Table 1. Differences between Organic and Conventionally Produced Meat Food Products, Country and Nutritional, Sensory, and Technological Aspects

Food Products


Nutritional, Sensory and Technological Aspects

Pig Korea Organically reared pigs had higher myoglobin content compared with those for conventionally the reared pigs
Suckling lamb United Kingdom The appearance of the organic raw meat was more fibrous, darker, and with a lower aroma intensity than the conventional one. In grilled meat, the organic samples had less subcutaneous fat, less fibrous texture, less aroma intensity, but also less juiciness than the conventional one
Chickens Midwest Organically raised chickens had less yellow appearance for breast, thigh, and skin pieces when compared with conventional carcass components
Source: 43


Organic egg has higher omega-3 fatty acid content and a lower omega-6/omega-3, especially when pasture was widely available. Hens were kept indoors in a standard housing system (“control”), with access to 4 m2 of pasture per hen (“organic”), in line with current requirements for organic laying hens, or with access to 10 m2 of pasture.48 Organic eggs are lighter, less pigmented, with a lower yolk/albumen ratio but also more fragile than conventional eggs. However, the number of studies concerning eggs is limited (Table 2).24,38

Table 2. Differences between Organic and Conventionally Produced Eggs Food Products Country Nutritional, Sensory and Technological Aspect

Food Products


Nutritional, Sensory and Technological Aspects

Egg Italy Organic eggs are significantly lighter; it was found a lower yolk/albumen ratio, lower eggshell breaking strength in organic eggs than in conventional eggs. It was also observed a lower pigmentation on of organic yolk
Egg Netherland Lower eggshell breaking strength in organic eggs
Source: Breithaupt et al26

Most human studies reported mother-and-child have positive associations between organic vegetable and dairy consumption due to reduce risks of pre-eclampsia in mothers, hypospadias in baby boys and eczema in infants.18,31,49

The human studies that have directly investigated the effects of organic food on human health have so far yielded some observations, including indications of a lower risk of childhood allergies, adult overweight/obesity and reduce Hodgkin lymphoma (but not for total cancer) in consumers of organic food.5,50

Organic food consumption results in higher dietary intakes of a range of nutritionally desirable compounds such as antioxidants, certain vitamins, and omega-3 fatty acids, but lower intakes of nutritionally undesirable pesticides, cadmium, and saturated fatty acids, so organic foods are safer for human consumption (Table 3).7,32,51

Table 3. Definition of Food Safety, Including Aspects of Both Product Safety and Agrifood-system Safety

Food Products

Product Safety Agri-food-system safety
• Safety, non-toxicity of the food
• Safety, nutritious food
• Safety of the declaration (all components of the food are shown on a declaration)
• Safety of the label (the organic food is truly organic)
• Safety of supply
• Safety of distribution
• Safety of transparency and proximity
• Safety of consumer influence on food production
• Safety of information on the whole food production process (e.g. by using label
• Safety, no negative impacts of production practices on humans and other living organisms, the environment, climate, etc.
Source: 1,18

 Effect of Regulation of Animal Product

Principles of organic animal husbandry at all times require a thorough analysis of the problems and opportunities involved and existing local knowledge. Some key considerations in organic animal husbandry that producers and other stakeholders need to take into account are the origins of livestock, livestock feed, living conditions, waste management, health care, record keeping.3,5,33

The regulation of organic animal production is comprehensive and influences aspects of feeding, housing, demarcation, care, medical treatment, and slaughter. An European Union (EU) regulation on organic animal husbandry was released in 1999 (1804/99), different aspects of which are expected to directly affect the composition of organic animal products. This regulation provides for access to outdoor areas with a lower stocking density and restrictions on animal feeds: compulsory use of roughage feeds, ban on antibiotics, growth promoters and additive, ban on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) plus prohibit on meat and bone meal.21,38

Access to outdoor area:

Usually, zoonotic diseases can be transmitted from animals to human beings through the consumption of food, but in conventional agriculture, attempts have been made to control zoonosis through the use of hygiene barriers. Knowledge about the influence of different production systems on the occurrence and distribution of microbes in foods still very limited. However, in comparison with conventional farming practice, in outdoor organic animal production systems, the density of livestock per hectare is relatively low. This may decrease the pressure of infection and help to neutralize the risk of zoonosis.32,52,53

Conventional production is typically aiming for high production levels with restricted input resources such as space, feed, etc., and these conditions may cause stress in the individual animal as it is unable to cope with the situation, e.g. in pig production. This means that higher stocking density, restricted space, and barren environment are factors increasing the risk of the development of diseases, and therefore it is more likely that animals under these conditions need antibiotic treatments.43 Organic production aims for less intensive animal production, which generally means that the animals have access to a more spacious and enriched environment, access to an outdoor range and restricted group sizes, and other preconditions.3,25

Compensatory use of roughage:

In organic production systems, feed composition has a great role in reducing the incidence of zoonosis as compared to the conventional production system. Accordingly, in organic farms due to the higher content of grass in animal diets, a significantly higher content of conjugated linolic acid has been observed as compared to conventional milk. A higher content of conjugated linolic acid in organic milk could have positive consequences for health, because it may help to control the onset of cancer and arteriosclerosis. Feed composition can reduce the incidence of zoonosis in organic as compared to conventional production systems (Table 4), the compulsory use of roughages in organic systems reducing the occurrence of harmful intestinal bacteria.15,19,24

Table 4. Effect of Regulation on Product Safety in Organic Animal Production Compared to Conventional Farming

Product Safety in Organic Products

Compound or Organism

Potential Effects on Human Health

Driving Force State

Concentration of Compound Organism

Impact on Human Health

Conjugated linolic acid (CLA) in milk Preventive against cancer and arteriosclerosis More grass fodder Higher than in conventional product Positive
Salmonella, Campylobacter Infections Extended use of out-doors areas. Compulsory use of roughages Lower/higher than in conventional product Both positive and negative
Medicine residues Transfer of resistance genes from animals to human pathogens Restricted use of medicine, double retention time Possibly lower than in conventional product Positive
Source: 52

Restrict the use of medicine:

National Organic Standards (NOS) prohibit the use of any antibiotics in livestock production. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the benefits of organic production in protecting human health, directly reducing consumer exposure to antibiotic-resistant bacteria via contact and consumption of animal products. According to different investigations on retail meat products, organic chicken, turkey, pork, beef, and even eggs are much less likely to be contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria than conventional meat products.13,31,54

Pesticides that may contaminate feeds are potentially toxic to farm livestock, and this is even more worrying if the animal products are intended for human consumption.37,55 The restricted use of antibiotics could have a positive effect on health by reducing the risk for transfer of resistance genes from animals to human pathogens.56 The growth-promoting, prophylactic and routine use of antibiotics in agriculture is of mounting concern to governments and the medical profession, and there is growing evidence that it is contributing to increasing antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria. Antibiotics in animal feed are currently under review in the EU and several of those used as growth promoters are already banned.37,57,58

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is increasingly recognized by many international health organizations as a global public health issue and a threat to the modern health care system that could hamper the control of many infectious diseases and dramatically set back the modern medicine.12 The growing worldwide phenomenon of AMR is generally associated with the “selective pressure” caused by the improper use, overuse, or misuse of antimicrobials in humans and animals. Infections by antibiotic-resistant strains are associated with a reduced quality of life, with metastatic bacterial infections, an increase in recurrence rates, chronicity, and future opportunistic infections with resistant organisms.59

Antimicrobial resistance can lead to increased costs and the destabilization of health systems. Patients suffering from antimicrobial resistance nosocomial infections (mainly bloodstream infections) or who become sick due to the consumption of food contaminated by resistant pathogens experience longer recovery and a higher frequency of septicemic infections and mortality. In this situation, health care costs are higher, due to extended hospital stays and the use of more expensive drugs. Moreover, there are higher risks of toxicity associated with new drugs, as well as a greater frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and collateral events.60,61

Organic Food Consumers

Consumers’ perceptions of naturalness are important for the acceptance of foods and food technologies. Thus, several studies have examined the significance of naturalness among consumers. Nonetheless, the aspects that are considered essential in perceiving a food item as natural may vary across consumers and different stakeholder groups.62 Assessed consumer perceptions towards organic food and found that food safety, human health and environmental concern along with sensory attributes such as nutritive value, taste, freshness and appearance influence organic food consumer preferences.63

Consumers’ perceptions regarding the quality of organic food consumption are influenced by different factors, such as freshness, food safety, price, environment-friendly, nutrition, and sensory attributes. Thus, food consumption patterns are everchanging as a result of health and environmental issues.19 They prefer to buy organic food products because of their perception that organic food products are healthy and safe, nutritious and environment-friendly. Currently, organic food consumers seem to pay more attention to “hedonistic” motives for purchasing of organic food, such as health, taste and wellness, rather than to “altruistic” purchasing motives, such as environmental protection and animal welfare; this confirms the role played by sensory attributes in orienting food choices.7,44

Consumers are very aware that organic food is good for health, these products are free from chemical which resulting in no side effects and do not cause harm to the consumers. The consumers living in urban areas are more aware of organic food products. Consumer believes that consumption of organic food helps to reduce stress level and maintain an energetic lifestyle. Another factor this study found that respondents are willing to pay even higher prices because it is beneficial for health.17,32,53

Global Organic Market

In the last few years, the organic product production and availability in the market has been increased and made a significant development in the economy. Several people have started to consider organic food instead of conventional food because it is healthier and less/no chemicals. This kind of purchasing behavior plays an important role in the consumer attitude and perception aspect of buying organic food products.57 The approach for buying organic food is mainly influenced by gender, age, income, level of education and the presence of children in the household identified the main reasons for organic food consumption among consumers. The main reasons are concerns about health and nutrition, more delicious taste, care for the environment, food safety, lack of trust in conventional food, care for animal welfare, support the local economy, freshness, curiosity or because they are considered trendy.15,32,53

Challenges in Organic Animal Food Production

TMost serious problems are still restricting growth in organic farming. Some of these potential obstacles, especially when exporting livestock products, are as follows: small-sized land holdings, low-level of literacy, lack of information about organic production practices, high stocking density, Inadequate production of feeds and fodders, high cost of certification.45,63 It is difficult to provide a large locomotion area, cost of production of organic meat is very high (in case of pork, 85.2% high), organic milk and meat production may further decrease the availability of milk and meat, processing or preservation of meat and meat products is difficult without use of certain chemicals like tri-sodium phosphate, sodium nitrate, etc.29


Organic agriculture is one of the farming system which had been practiced by farmers from prehistoric times, and free from the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, growth regulators and livestock feed additives rather used animal originated products. The application of organic farming has a great role in public health since it reduces the risk of childhood allergies, adult overweight/obesity, and the development of some cancers in consumers. In general, many people turn their face to purchase organic food products rather than conventional food because it has health important and less chemical residue. Even though organic farming has a great role in human health and biodiversity safety, but still so many constraints which obstacle its development stage like lack of awareness, inadequate production of feedstuff, lack of enough land, lack of information about its practice, high cost of production, etc. In conclusion, private and governmental organic farm owners need to be trained, encouraged and supported on how to practice and manage the organic farming system. The government and associated institutions should be creating awareness and encourage the importance of organic products for customers through scientifically explored research.


The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

1. World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Organically Produced Foods. Website.
http:// Accessed November 18, 2019.

2. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Organic Agriculture and Food Security in Africa. Website. Accessed November 18, 2019.

3. Frączak MGRК. Organic farming in proposed future European regulation–a way to develop or to impede the sector. Вісник Національної академії правових наук України. [In: Ukrainian] 2016; 3(86): 92-97.

4. International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM). IFOAM Basic Standards for Organic Production and Processing. Website. IFOAM_basic_standards.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.

5. Kesse-Guyot E, Baudry J, Assmann KE, Galan P, Hercberg S, Lairon D. Prospective association between consumption frequency of organic food and body weight change, risk of overweight or obesity: results from the NutriNet-Santé Study. Br J Nutr. 2017; 117(2): 325-334. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517000058

6. British Medical Association. The Impact of Genetic Modification on Agriculture, Food and Health: An Interim Statement. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 1999.

7. Sivathanu B. Factors affecting consumer preference towards the organic food purchases. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(33): 1-6. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i33/78261

8. Jespersen LM, Baggesen DL, Fog E, et al. Contribution of organic farming to public goods in Denmark. Organic Agriculture. 2017; 7(3): 243-266. doi: 10.1007/s13165-017-0193-7

9. Lu C, Toepel K, Irish R, Fenske RA, Barr DB, Bravo R. Organic diets significantly lower children’s dietary exposure to organophosphorus pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 114(2): 260-263. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8418

10. Mallory EB, Halberg N, Andreasen L, Delate K, Ngouajio M. Innovations in organic food systems for sustainable production and ecosystem services: An introduction to the special issue of sustainable agriculture research. Sustainable Agriculture Research. 2015; 4(3 Special): 1-4. doi: 10.5539/sar.v4n3p1

11. O’neill J. Antimicrobial resistance: Tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. Rev Antimicrob Resist. 2014; 20: 1-16.

12. Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proce Natl Acad Sci. 2015; 112(18): 5649-5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112

13. Winter CK, Davis SF. Organic foods. Int J Food Sci. 2006; 71(9): R117-R124. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00196.x

14. Benbrook C, Zhao X, Yáñez J, Davies N, Andrews P. New evidence confirms the nutritional superiority of plant-based organic foods. Paper presented at: 136st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition; 2008; San Diego, California, USA.

15. Ozores-Hampton M. Guidelines for assessing compost quality for safe and effective utilization in vegetable production. Hort Technology. 2017; 27(2): 162-165. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH03349-16

16. Weiske A, Vabitsch A, Olesen JE, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in European conventional and organic dairy farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2006; 112(2-3): 221- 232. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.023

17. Sharma G, Dewan R, Bali S. Factors influencing consumer buying behavior & awareness towards organic food: A study of Chandigarh & Panchkula consumers. Int J Sci Res. 2014; 5(2): 689-696.

18. Carter DP, Weible CM, Siddiki SN, Basurto X. Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2016; 28(1): 159-185. doi: 10.1177/0951629815603494

19. Mukul A, Afrin S, Hassan MM. Factors affecting consumers’ perceptions about organic food and their prevalence in bangladeshi organic preference. J Bus Manag Sci. 2013; 1: 112-118. doi: 10.12691/jbms-1-5-5

20. Hovi M, Sundrum A, Thamsborg SM. Animal health and welfare in organic livestock production in Europe: Current state and future challenges. Livestock Production Science. 2003; 80(1-2): 41-53. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00320-2

21. Commission E. Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Official Journal L 250. 2008: 1-84.

22. Woods VB, Fearon AM. Dietary sources of unsaturated fatty acids for animals and their transfer into meat, milk and eggs: A review. Livestock Science. 2009; 126(1-3): 1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.07.002

23. Field CJ, Johnson IR, Schley PD. Nutrients and their role in host resistance to infection. J Leukoc Biol. 2002; 71(1): 16-32.

24. Mugnai C, Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Ruggeri S, Mattioli S, Castellini C. The effects of husbandry system on the grass intake and egg nutritive characteristics of laying hens. J Sci Food Agric. 2014; 94(3): 459-467. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6269

25. Bowen D. International Harmonisation of organic standards and guarantee systems. In: OECD Workshop on Organic Agriculture. OECD, Washington, DC. 2002: 199.

26. Breithaupt D, Weller P, Grashorn M. Quantification of carotenoids in chicken plasma after feeding free or esterified lutein and capsanthin using high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Poult Sci. 2003; 82(3): 395-401. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.3.395

27. Hansen B, Alrøe HF, Kristensen ES, Wier M. Assessment of food safety in organic farming. Website. Accessed November 18, 2019.

28.Castellini C, Mugnai C, Dal Bosco A. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2002; 60(3): 219-225. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00124-3

29. Chander M, Subrahmanyeswari B. Setting up an organic dairy farm: steps. Indian Dairyman. 2007; 59(2): 59.

30. Magnusson U. Breeding for improved disease resistance in organic farming–possibilities and constraints. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 2002; 43(1): S59-S61. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-43-S1-S59

31. National Organic Program Regulations. Website. http://www. Accessed November 18, 2019.

32. Rembiałkowska E, Załęcka A, Badowski M, Ploeger A. The quality of organically produced food. Organic Farming and Food Production. 2012: 65.

33. Vaarst M, Roderick S, Byarugaba DK, Kobayashi S, RubaireAiikii C, Karreman HJ. Sustainable veterinary medical practices in organic farming: A global perspective. Global Development of organic Agriculture: Challenges and Prospects: CAB International. 2006: 241-276.

34. Von Borell E, Sørensen JT. Organic livestock production in Europe: aims, rules and trends with special emphasis on animal health and welfare. Livestock Production Science. 2004; 90(1): 3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.07.003

35. Maruejouls B, Goulard F. Résidus de pesticides dans le lait. Des résultats encourageants pour les produits de l’agriculture biologique. Altern Agric [In: French]. 1999; 37: 10-13.

36. Crinnion WJ. Organic foods contain higher levels of certain nutrients, lower levels of pesticides, and may provide health benefits for the consumer. Altern Med Rev. 2010; 15(1): 4-12.

37. Winter CK. Pesticide residues in imported, organic, and “suspect” fruits and vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 2012; 60(18): 4425- 4429. doi: 10.1021/jf205131q

38. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Training manuals for organic agriculture. Website. https://resources.peopleinneed. cz/documents/242-fao-training-manual-for-organic-agriculture. pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.

39. Haug A, Høstmark AT, Harstad OM. Bovine milk in human nutrition–a review. Lipids Health Dis. 2007; 6(1): 25. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-6-25

40. Khiaosa-ard R, Kreuzer M, Leiber F. Apparent recovery of C18 polyunsaturated fatty acids from feed in cow milk: A metaanalysis of the importance of dietary fatty acids and feeding regimens in diets without fat supplementation. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98(9): 6399-6414. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9459

41. Butler G, Nielsen JH, Slots T, et al. Fatty acid and fat-soluble antioxidant concentrations in milk from high-and low-input conventional and organic systems: Seasonal variation. J Sci Food Agric. 2008; 88(8): 1431-1441. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3235

42. Kusche D. Organic milk and nutritional benefits for the consumer. In: Organic Food Quality & Health Newsletter. 2009.

43. Luik A, Pehme S, Matt D, Peetsmann E, Rembialkowska E. Quality of organic vs. conventional food and effects on health: report. Website. b72d46424030508cc5589d2ea5e4e39775f7.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.

44. Shepherd R, Magnusson M, Sjödén P-O. Determinants of consumer behavior related to organic foods. Ambio. 2005; 34(4): 352- 360. doi: 10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0352:docbrt];2

45. Siderer Y, Maquet A, Anklam E. Need for research to support consumer confidence in the growing organic food market. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2005; 16(8): 332-343. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.02.001

46. Sundrum A, Bütfering L, Henning M, Hoppenbrock K. Effects of on-farm diets for organic pig production on performance and carcass quality. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78(5): 1199-1205. doi: 10.2527/2000.7851199x

47. Angood K, Wood J, Nute G, Whittington F, Hughes S, Sheard P. A comparison of organic and conventionally-produced lamb purchased from three major UK supermarkets: Price, eating quality and fatty acid composition. Meat Sci. 2008; 78(3): 176-184. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.06.002

48. Minelli G, Sirri F, Folegatti E, Meluzzi A, Franchini A. Egg quality traits of laying hens reared in organic and conventional systems. Italian J Ani Sci. 2007; 6: 728-730. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.728

49. Brantsæter AL, Torjusen H, Meltzer HM, et al. Organic food consumption during pregnancy and hypospadias and cryptorchidism at birth: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Environ Health Perspect. 2015; 124(3): 357-364. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409518

50. Bradbury K, Balkwill A, Spencer E, et al. Organic food consumption and the incidence of cancer in a large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110(9): 2321- 2326. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.148

51. Dangour AD, Dodhia SK, Hayter A, Allen E, Lock K, Uauy R. Nutritional quality of organic foods: A systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 90(3): 680-685. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28041

52. O’Doherty-Jensen K, Nygaard-Larsen H, Mølgaard JP, et al. Økologiske fødevarer og menneskets sundhed [In: Danish]. Website. Vidensynteser/Fodevarer_sundhed_Rap_14.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.

53. Petrescu-Mag RM, Petrescu DC. Organic agriculture as component of sustainable development. Romania’s case. Advances in Agriculture & Botanics. 2010; 2(2): 121-132.

54. Young I, Rajić A, Wilhelm B, Waddell L, Parker S, McEwen S. Comparison of the prevalence of bacterial enteropathogens, potentially zoonotic bacteria and bacterial resistance to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect. 2009; 137(9): 1217-1232. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809002635

55. Sekkin S, Kum C. Possible natural toxins in organic livestock farming. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013; 19(4): 725-734. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2012.8415

56. The Bichel Committee. Organic scenarios for Denmark. Web site. html/helepubl_eng.htm. Accessed November 18, 2019.

57. Marchand PA. Basic substances under EU pesticide regulation: An opportunity for organic production? Organic Farming. 2017; 3(1): 16-19. doi: 10.12924/of2017.03010016

58. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food M. website. http:// Accessed November 18, 2019.

59. Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria: A challenge for the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013; 53(1): 11-48. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.519837

60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About antimicrobial resistance. Website. http://www cdc gov/drugresistance/about html. Accessed May 20, 2014.

61. Miranda J, Vazquez B, Fente C, Barros-Velázquez J, Cepeda A, Abuín CF. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey. European Food Research and Technology. 2008; 226(3): 371-375. doi: 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y

62. Roman S, Sánchez-Siles LM, Siegrist M. The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017; 67: 44-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.010

63. Shafie FA, Rennie D. Consumer perceptions towards organic food. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 49: 360-367. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.034


ROTEM Illustration

Rotational Thromboelastometry: Enhancing Hemostasis Monitoring in Anesthesia

Girishkumar Modi*, Vijay Kumar and Nagaraju Munagala


Examining the Rise of Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19: A Call to Action for Psychologists as Social Advocates

Miranda Landfield, Naqsh Ali, Shahrzad Azarafza, Shelly Baer, Anushree Belur, Naomi Griffin, Dilara Kosak, Jennifer Lerch, Rose Patatanian, Elizabeth Quintero, Stephanie Scott, Guy Balice* and Melia Leibert


Effect of Rhodiola Rosea Supplement on Exhaustive Swimming Test and Physical Fatigue in Male Institute of Cancer Research Mice

Wan-Li Chu, Mon-Chine Lee, Yi-Ju Hsu, Chi-Chang Huang and Yu-Jou Chien*


Safety and Efficacy of Biweekly Gemcitabine in Combination with Capecitabine in Elderly and Frail Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer

Muhammad W. Saif*, Nausheen Hakim, Jeffrey Chi, Hasan Rehman, William Nealon, Antonia Maloney, Melissa H. Smith and Jyothi Jose


Liver-Directed Therapy and Systemic Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Liver Metastases: Experience of 12-years

Muhammad W. Saif*, Shreya P. Goyal, Antonia Maloney, Melissa H. Smith and Jyothi Jose


Mucormycosis in COVID-19 Pandemic

Safa Nefzaoui, Nadia Romdhane, Hela Farjallah*, Imen Zoghlami, Inès Hariga and Chiraz M. Chaouch


Surgical Treatment of Sternal Fracture: Case Report and Literature Review.

Surgical Treatment of Sternal Fracture: Case Report and Literature Review

Jorge Pérez-Acosta, Orlando Téllez-Almenares*, Justo Escalona-Cartaya, Raúl Calas-Balbuena and Olga M. Moreira-Barinaga