Review Procedure

The review procedure for the Veterinary Medicine Journal is designed to uphold the highest standards of scientific integrity and to ensure the publication of impactful research that advances the field of veterinary science. Upon submission, manuscripts are first subjected to an initial editorial review to confirm adherence to the journal's formatting guidelines and ethical standards. If the manuscript meets these preliminary criteria, it is then sent for peer review, where two to four independent experts in veterinary medicine are selected to evaluate the work. Reviewers assess the manuscript based on several critical factors, including the originality and relevance of the research, the robustness of the methodology, the clarity of the writing, and the significance of the findings for veterinary practice and animal health. Typically, reviewers are given 2-4 weeks to complete their evaluations. After the review process, the editorial team compiles the feedback and recommendations, categorizing the manuscript as accepted, requiring minor revisions, requiring major revisions, or rejected. If revisions are necessary, authors receive detailed comments and are provided a specified timeframe to address the reviewers' concerns before resubmitting their manuscript. The editorial team then reviews the revised submission, which may be sent back to the original reviewers for further assessment. A final decision is made based on the comprehensive feedback received, and authors are promptly notified of the outcome. Once a manuscript is accepted, it undergoes final editing and formatting to ensure it meets the journal's publication standards. This rigorous review process not only maintains the integrity of the journal but also promotes the dissemination of significant research that contributes to the welfare of animals and the advancement of veterinary medicine.