Editorial Policies

1. Creative Commons License
2. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
3. Publisher Policies
4. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
5. Peer Review Process
6. Editorial Process
7. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
8. Editorial Policies
9. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)
10. Advertisement Policies

1. Creative Commons License

The Veterinary Medicine journal embraces the Creative Commons (CC) licensing system for its published works, providing authors with the option to choose from several CC licenses for their articles. These licenses allow authors to retain copyright while granting others permission to share, reuse, and redistribute their work under specified conditions. The most common license used by the journal is the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to copy, distribute, and adapt the work as long as proper attribution is given to the original author. Other options include the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license, which restricts use to non-commercial purposes. This licensing system aligns with the journal’s commitment to open access, ensuring that research is freely available and accessible to the global community while maintaining authors' rights. Authors are encouraged to choose the license that best suits their goals for the dissemination of their work, enhancing the reach and impact of their research.

2. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism

The Veterinary Medicine journal adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for addressing plagiarism, which ensures ethical research and publication practices. The COPE recommends that plagiarism in any form—whether it is the direct copying of text or the improper paraphrasing of others’ ideas without appropriate citation—should be thoroughly investigated. When plagiarism is suspected, the editorial team performs a rigorous review, including using plagiarism detection software, and addresses any identified issues according to COPE's flowchart for dealing with research misconduct. The journal takes a strict stance on plagiarism, rejecting manuscripts that contain plagiarized content. If plagiarism is discovered after publication, the article may be retracted or corrected, depending on the severity. The Veterinary Medicine journal emphasizes the importance of originality, transparency, and proper citation practices to maintain the integrity of the scientific literature and prevent unethical behavior in research.

3. Publisher Policies

The Veterinary Medicine journal, as part of its commitment to ethical and transparent publishing, follows a set of publisher policies designed to ensure quality, accountability, and the protection of authors’ and readers' rights. These policies include guidelines on ethical publishing, copyright transfer or licensing, open access publication, and transparency in financial dealings. The publisher adheres to international standards for academic publishing, such as COPE and ICMJE guidelines, to uphold the integrity of the publication process. The publisher also ensures compliance with national and international regulations, including data protection and privacy laws. Additionally, the publisher provides clear information regarding submission guidelines, fees, and the peer review process. This set of policies ensures that all published work is credible, properly credited, and accessible, maintaining the journal’s reputation as a trustworthy source of scientific research in the field of veterinary medicine.

4. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Veterinary Medicine journal’s Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement establishes a clear set of ethical standards that must be followed by authors, reviewers, and editors. This statement is based on the ethical principles outlined by organizations like COPE, ensuring that all parties involved in the publication process maintain high standards of integrity. It covers important issues such as authorship, conflicts of interest, data fabrication, plagiarism, and the protection of human and animal subjects in research. If a breach of ethics occurs, such as duplicate publication or falsification of data, the journal commits to investigating the matter thoroughly. Depending on the outcome, the article may be retracted, corrected, or removed. This statement is part of the journal’s efforts to promote transparency, honesty, and fairness in academic publishing, ensuring that all research published in Veterinary Medicine is credible and trustworthy.

5. Peer Review Process

The Veterinary Medicine journal follows a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality and validity of the research it publishes. Upon submission, manuscripts are first assessed by the editorial team to ensure they meet the journal’s scope and quality standards. If accepted for review, manuscripts are sent to two or more expert reviewers in the relevant field. These reviewers are asked to provide constructive feedback on the manuscript’s scientific validity, originality, and relevance. Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editorial team makes a decision regarding the manuscript’s acceptance, revision, or rejection. The peer review process is double-blind, meaning both the reviewers and the authors are anonymous to each other, which helps to ensure impartiality. The journal adheres to COPE’s guidelines for ethical peer review, ensuring the process is fair, thorough, and unbiased. Additionally, the journal encourages timely reviews to expedite the publication process.

6. Editorial Process

The Veterinary Medicine journal’s editorial process is designed to ensure that published research meets high academic and ethical standards. After submission, manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment to determine their suitability for the journal’s scope. If deemed appropriate, the manuscript is sent for peer review, where experts in the field provide feedback on the quality, originality, and scientific rigor of the work. Once peer review is completed, the editorial board evaluates the reviewers’ comments and makes a decision on the manuscript, which could involve accepting, revising, or rejecting the paper. Authors are encouraged to revise their manuscripts according to the reviewers' suggestions and resubmit for further review if needed. Throughout this process, the editorial team ensures transparency, maintains ethical standards, and handles conflicts of interest in a fair and transparent manner. This editorial process ensures that only high-quality, scientifically sound research is published in Veterinary Medicine.

7. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Editors)

The Veterinary Medicine journal requires editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest and financial disclosures to ensure the editorial process is unbiased and transparent. Editors must disclose any relationships, financial or otherwise, that could influence their judgment regarding a manuscript. This includes financial ties to institutions, research funding sources, or other potential conflicts that may affect decision-making. The journal ensures that editors recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a conflict of interest exists to prevent bias in the review process. Editors must also ensure that all disclosed conflicts are clearly communicated to authors and reviewers. The policy fosters transparency, trust, and fairness in the publication process, maintaining the journal’s credibility and academic integrity.

8. Editorial Policies

The Veterinary Medicine journal’s editorial policies provide guidelines for both the editorial team and authors to ensure high standards of academic publishing. These policies cover various aspects, including manuscript submission, review, and decision-making processes, as well as the ethical guidelines for authorship, plagiarism, and conflicts of interest. The editorial board adheres to COPE guidelines for ethical publishing and ensures that all accepted articles meet the journal’s scientific standards. Additionally, the editorial policies address issues such as publication frequency, manuscript preparation, and the journal's scope. The editorial team is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the review and publication processes, ensuring fairness, transparency, and quality in all published content.

9. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors)

According to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) recommendations, editors are required to disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect their impartiality during the editorial process. Veterinary Medicine journal follows COPE’s guidelines by ensuring that editors are transparent about any financial, personal, or professional connections that could bias their decisions. These conflicts of interest include, but are not limited to, personal relationships with authors, financial investments in related industries, or direct involvement in related research. If an editor has a conflict of interest related to a manuscript, they must recuse themselves from the decision-making process. This policy helps preserve the integrity of the peer review and editorial processes, fostering a trustworthy and unbiased environment for publishing research.

10. Advertisement Policies

The Veterinary Medicine journal has clear policies governing the inclusion of advertisements in its issues. Advertisements must align with the journal’s scope and ethical standards, promoting products or services that are relevant to the field of veterinary medicine and medical research. All advertisements are clearly separated from editorial content to avoid any confusion about the content’s credibility. The journal maintains editorial independence and ensures that advertisements do not influence the scientific content or decisions regarding article publication. Additionally, the journal is transparent about the process for accepting advertisements, and all advertisers must comply with the journal’s ethical guidelines. The advertisement policy ensures that the publication remains focused on academic integrity and does not allow commercial interests to compromise its editorial mission.