Anthropology

Open journal

ISSN 2473-4772

Cephalic Index of The Igbos, Nigeria

Ekezie Jervas*, Anele Theresa Ihejihuka, Iwuoha Greg, Eke CC and Osuchukwu IW

Ekezie Jervas, PhD

Senior Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, School of Health Technology Federal University of Technology P.M.B 1526 Owerri, Nigeria; Tel. +234 806 5430037; E-mail: ekeziejervas@gmail.com

INTRODUCTION

Genetic change overtime results to evolution. Evolutionary processes arise due to natural selection, nutrition, genetic drifts and genetic flow. These processes affect the human body.1 The change on the human body overtime has to be documented using simple anthropometric measurement.

Anthropology deals with the measurement of the physical sizes and shapes of human body.2 Data obtained from such measurements have been very useful in differentiating people of diverse ethnic groups, nutritional status, economic status and gender. Several measurable anthropometric variables have been developed over the years. Cephalic Index (CI) is one of such very important anthropometric variable used in physical anthropology to determine geographical gender, age and racial variations.3

CI is the most investigated craniofacial parameters as it uses the length and breadth of the head which are useful indices in the study of secular trend.4,5 The ratio of the maximum head breadth (MHB) to the maximum head length (MHL) i.e. (HB X 100/HL), can be used to measure the size of the head.6 CI gives an idea of how genetic characters are transmitted between parents, offspri1ng and siblings.7 It is inherited in a unitary fashion.8

Three basic classifications of CI that can be used to describe the human head patterns have been documented. These include dolichocephaly, mesocephaly and brachycephaly.9

In this study we attempted to investigate the pattern of head distribution of the study population using the above basic classifications for the consumption of the Forensic Anthropologists and Craniofacial Surgeons.

STUDY LOCATION AND DURATION

The present study was carried out at Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria and it covered a period of five months as follows:

(i) Four months for field work.
(ii) One month for data analysis and interpretations.

Demographics

The subjects gave information on their age, sex, and state of origin.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who were not of Igbo extraction and subjects with bushy/artificial hairs were not included in the study.

Anthropometrics

The following measurements (cm) were taken when the subjects were sitting in a relaxed manner and head held in Anatomical position.

Maximum Head Length (MHL)

Measures the straight distance between glabella (the most prominent point on the frontal bone above the root of the nose, between the eyebrows) and the opisthocranion (the most prominent portion of the occiput, close to the midline on the posterior rim of the foramen magnum).

Maximum Head Breath (MHB)

Measures the distance between the most lateral points of the parietal bone. It is also called maximum bi-parietal diameter.

 The CI was then calculated as

ANTPOJ-1-105formuala1

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

The data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 17.0 software).

In summarizing the data, the Minimum, Maximum, Mean and Standard deviations of the age, MHB and MHL were established and presented. Also the value and the percentages of various cephalic phenol type are presented too.

RESULT

The standard deviation, the mean, the maximum and minimum values of the anthropometric variables of the study population are shown in Table 1. In overall, females were more varied with higher mean values than males.

Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the study population.

Total

Female Male
Mean Std.dev Min Max Mean Std. dev Min Max Mean Std.dev Min

Max

Age

23.48 4.82 17 45 23.62 5.13 17 45 23.30 4.38 18 43

MHL

32.02 4.82 20 59 31.99 5.48 20 59 32.07 3.79 22 38

MHB

22.36 2.70 15.5 31 22.86 2.91 15.5 31 21.69 2.21 16 29

CI

71.57 14.81 35.59 120.83 73.60 16.15 35.59 120.83 68.80 12.33 47.89 120.83

CI: Cephalic Index, MHL: Maximum Head Length, MHB: Maximum Head Breath.

The cephalic phenotype indicates that 66.7% of the study population was Dolichocephalic, 21.7% was Brachycephalic, While 11.6% was Mesocephalic (Table 2).

Table 2: Different types of cephalic phenotypes of males and females.

Cephalic Phenotype

Cephalic Index (CI) (in cm) Female Male

Combined

Dolichocephalic ‘head length longer than width’

Female: <75
Male: <75.9

68 59.6% 64 76.2% 132

66.7%

Mesocephalic‘head is round’

Female: 75-83
Male: 76-81

15 13.2% 9 10.7% 23

11.6%

Brachycephalic ‘head wider than length’

Female: >83
Male: >81.1

31 27.2% 11 13.1% 43

21.7%

Total

114

100% 84 100% 198

100%

The cephalometric dimensions measured directly showed statistically significant differences between females and males (p<0.02), with females having higher mean values than males (see Tables 1 and 3).

Table 3: Sex differences in cephalic phenotype.

Mean

Std. dev Std. err 95% Confidence Interval T

p-value

Female

73.60 16.15 1.51 70.61 76.60

Male

68.80 12.33 1.35 66.12

71.47

Difference 4.81 2.02 0.81 8.80 t=2.374

0.0185

Df(Satterhwaite)=195.7

DISCUSSION

This study showed that the Cephalometric dimensions of the females were significantly higher than those of the males (p<0.02), the reason for this difference cannot be immediately explained but it agrees with sexual dimorphism. The mean CI (71.57) of this study was lower than that (79.80) observed et al10 and that (74.39) documented et al11 for the Yoruba population of Nigeria.

Base on the basic classification of CI, the population under study was predominantly Dolichocephalic.

The CI for the present study was lower than that (75) reported by Abolhasanzadeh et al12 in a study in Tehran- Iran; 80.42 in a study in India7 , and 80.42 in a study in Chile.18 The CI from our study is also lower than a study in native Fars males with 84.8.9

In the present study, we observed gender difference with females having a higher CI of 73.60 compared 68.80 of the males.

Investigations carried out on the CI of the males and females of Gurung community in Nepal revealed a significant gender difference,13 with males having a CI of 83.1 which is lower than female with a CI of 84.6.

In their study using Indian population1 also observe a higher CI in females (80.74±3.97) and lower value in the males (79.14±4.72).

In their study of Haryani population14 noted a mean CI of 66.72 in males and 72.25 in the females.

In another study by Raveendranath et al15 in Indian cadavers, the CI for the males was 76.97 while that of the females was 79.23.

The foregoing which agreed with our findings indicate that CI seems to be higher in the females than in males in most studies except those carried out by Oladipo et al11, Joy et al16 who noted a mean CI of 75.02±4.76 for males and 73.75±5.13 for female in Yoruba population.

This observed variation in the mean CI in the studies sighted above is due to the peculiarity of the populations, however, mean CI is higher in the females in most studies.

The dominant type of head shape observed in this study was dolichocephalic (76.20%). This finding is similar to a study in India17 in which 58.5% of population was dolichocephalic. The dominant type of head from this study was not similar to the following studies.7,9-11,18,19

CONCLUSION

The mean CI for the population was 71.57(66%) in the males, it was 68.80 (59%) and 73.60(76.2%) in the females. Dolichocephalic phenotype was more common in the overall population and in both sexes.

The Mesocephalic phenotype was 10.7% in the males and 13.2% in the females; while Brachycephalic phenotype was 13.1% in the males and 27.2% in the females. These observed values/head patterns would be of utmost importance to the Forensic Anthropologist and Craniofacial Surgeons.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

None.

1. Anitha MR, VijayanathV, Raju GM, Vijayamahantesh SN. Cephalic Index of North Indian Population. Anat Karnataka. 2011; 5(1): 40-43. Website. http://www.scopemed. org/?jft=44&ft=44-1315114178. Accessed April 4, 2016.

2. Poswillo D. Casual mechanism for craniofacial deformity. Br Med Bull. 1975; 31(2): 101-106. doi 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071260

3. Argyropoulos E, Sassouni V. Comparison of the dentofacial patterns for native Greek and American-Caucasian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 95(3): 238-249. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90054-1

4. Larsen CS. Bioarcheology. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press, 1997.

5. Kouchi M. Brachycephalization in Japan has ceased. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000; 112(3): 339-347. doi: 10.1002/ 1096-8644(200007)112:3<_x0033_39:_x003a_AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-6

6. Kelly KM, Littlefield T R, Pomatto JK, Riphley CE, Beals SP, Joganic EF. Importance of early recognition and treatment of deformational plagiocephaly with orthotic cranioplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36(2): 127-130. Website. http://www.cpcjournal.org/doi/pdf/10.1597/1545-1569%281999%29036%3C0 127%3AIOERAT%3E2.3.CO%3B2. Accessed April 4, 2016.

7. Shah GV, Jadhav HR. The study of cephalic index in students of Gujarat. J Anat Soc India. 2004; 53(1): 25-26. Website. http://medind.nic.in/jae/t04/i1/jaet04i1p25.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2016.

8. Sekla B, Soukup F. Inheritance of the cephalic index. Am J Phys Anthrop. 2005; 30(1): 137-140. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330300116

9. Golalipour MJ, Jahanshali M, Haidari K. The variation of head and face shapes in females newborns in the south- east of the Caspian sea (mean Gorgam). Eur J Anat. 2005; 9(2): 95-98. Website. http://eurjanat.com/data/pdf/eja.05020095.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2016.

10. Fawehinmi HB, Osunwoke AE, Ligha AE, Okoh PD. A comparative study on the cephalic indices of normal growing children and children with sickle cell anaemia in Port Harcourt. J Exp Clin Anat. 2008; 7(1): 27-29. doi: 10.4314/jeca.v7i1.48021

11. Oladipo GS, Anugweje KC, Bob-Manuel IF. Dolicocephalization in Cephalic Indices of Adult Yorubas of Nigeria. J Anthropol. 2014; doi: 10.1155/2014/819472

12. Abolhasanzadeh A, Farahani MR. Standarded international classification of head shapes of 22-24 years old in Tehran. J of Research in Medicine. 2003; 26: 281-285

13. Lobo SW, Chandrashekhar TS, Kumar S. Cephalic index of Gurung community of Nepal–an anthropometric study. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005; 3(3): 263-265.

14. Mahesh K, Patnaik VV, Gopichand. The study of Cephalic Index in Haryanvi population. Int Journal Pure App. Biosci. 2013; 1(3): 1-6. Website. http://www.ijpab.com/form/2013%20Volume%201,%20issue%203/IJPAB-2013-1-3-1-6.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2016.

15. Raveendranath V, Manjunath KY. An Anthropometric study of correlation between Cephalic index, Cranial volume and Cranial measurements in Indian cadavers. Dept. of Anatomy, St John’s Medical College, Bangalore-560 034. Website. http:// medind.nic.in/jaw/t10/i2/jawt10i2p55.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2016.

16. Joy O, Ahmed E, Gabriel O, Ezon-Ebidor E. Anthropometric study of the facial and nasal length of adult Igbo ethnic group in Nigeria. Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology. 2009; 2(2). Website. http://ispub.com/IJBA/2/2/9456. Accessed April 4, 2016.

17. Bhatia M, Thin J, Debray H, Cabanes J. Etude anthropologique et genetique de la population du nord de l’Inde. Bull Et Mem Soc d’Anthrop de Paris. 1995; 10: 199-213.

18. Del Sol M. Cephalic index in a group of mapuche individuals in the IX region of Chile. Int J Morphol. 2005; 23(3): 241-246.

19. Bhargava I, Kher GA. A comparative anthropometric study of Bhils and Barelas of Central India. J Anat Soc India. 1961; 10: 26-33.

LATEST ARTICLES

LATEST ARTICLES