Reviewer Policies
1. Reviewers Guidelines
The Reviewers Guidelines for Neuro – Open Journal provide detailed instructions to reviewers about the expectations and responsibilities involved in evaluating a manuscript. Reviewers are expected to assess the quality, validity, and significance of the research, ensuring that it adheres to the journal's ethical standards. The guidelines cover essential aspects such as evaluating the methodology, clarity of the writing, and the relevance of the research. Reviewers should provide constructive feedback that helps authors improve their work and make sound editorial recommendations.
2. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Reviewers)
The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Reviewers) policy ensures that reviewers disclose any potential conflicts of interest before reviewing a manuscript. Reviewers must reveal personal, professional, or financial relationships that could affect their impartiality in evaluating the manuscript. This policy is essential for maintaining transparency and fairness in the peer review process. Any undisclosed conflicts of interest may lead to the rejection of the reviewer’s comments and possibly impact the publication decision.
