Editorial Policies

 

1. Editorial Policies

The Editorial Policies for Neuro – Open Journal serve as a comprehensive guide to the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers involved in the publication process. These policies ensure that all decisions regarding the acceptance, rejection, and revisions of manuscripts are made based on sound scientific principles, fairness, and integrity. Editors must adhere to strict ethical standards to maintain transparency and avoid bias in the editorial process.

2. Creative Commons License

The Creative Commons License policy allows authors to retain the copyright of their work while giving others the right to reuse, share, and adapt the published articles, provided proper attribution is given. Neuro – Open Journal typically adopts the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to encourage widespread distribution and reuse of research findings. This licensing system supports open-access publishing, facilitating greater knowledge sharing across the scientific community.

3. Peer Review Process

The Peer Review Process is a vital component of ensuring the quality and credibility of articles published in Neuro – Open Journal. All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review, where both the identities of the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential. Reviewers assess the quality, methodology, and significance of the research, providing constructive feedback to help authors improve their manuscripts before publication.

4. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Editors)

Editors must adhere to the Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors) policy, which mandates that any personal, financial, or professional relationships that might influence their editorial decisions be disclosed. This ensures transparency and impartiality, preventing any potential biases that could affect the quality and objectivity of the review and editorial process.

5. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement for Neuro – Open Journal defines the ethical standards the journal upholds in all its publishing practices. This includes ensuring that research is conducted with integrity, free from fraud, plagiarism, and other forms of misconduct. The statement outlines the procedures to follow if ethical issues arise, ensuring that appropriate actions are taken in cases of research misconduct.

6. Advertisement Policies

The Advertisement Policies for Neuro – Open Journal ensure that advertisements do not interfere with the editorial independence or integrity of the journal. Advertisements must be clearly distinguishable from the content of the journal to avoid any confusion. Furthermore, all advertisements must adhere to ethical guidelines and cannot promote products or services that conflict with the journal's scientific goals.

7. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism

The COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism policy is designed to uphold the journal’s commitment to academic integrity. Neuro – Open Journal follows the guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to detect and address plagiarism. If an author is found to have committed plagiarism, the journal may retract the article, issue a correction, or take further action as needed to maintain the journal’s standards.

8. Editorial Process

The Editorial Process policy outlines the steps taken by the editorial board in handling submitted manuscripts. After an initial screening for adherence to submission guidelines, the manuscript is sent to peer reviewers. The editor evaluates the reviewers' feedback and makes the final decision on whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. This process ensures transparency, fairness, and consistency in editorial decisions.

9. Publisher Policies

The Publisher Policies define the operational guidelines followed by Neuro – Open Journal in managing the publishing process. These policies cover aspects such as the roles and responsibilities of the journal’s editorial and publishing teams, ethical considerations, and standards for publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed research. They are designed to maintain the journal's reputation and ensure that every article is published in compliance with best practices.

10. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors)

The COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors) policy is implemented to ensure that editors disclose any personal or professional interests that might influence their editorial decisions. By adhering to these guidelines, editors can maintain the trust of authors, reviewers, and readers, ensuring the objectivity and credibility of the publication process.