Reviewer Policies
1. Reviewers Guidelines
The Reviewers Guidelines outline the expectations and responsibilities of reviewers for Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal. Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal by evaluating submitted manuscripts for scientific merit, originality, significance, and methodological rigor. The guidelines emphasize that reviewers must provide clear, constructive feedback to authors and be objective in their evaluations. They are expected to assess the work impartially, without bias, and ensure that the research adheres to ethical standards, including proper citation and acknowledgement of sources. Reviewers must also keep the contents of the manuscript confidential and report any ethical concerns, such as potential conflicts of interest or plagiarism.
2. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Reviewers)
The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures policy for reviewers ensures that all reviewers for Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal act impartially and transparently. Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from personal, professional, or financial relationships that could influence their objectivity in reviewing manuscripts. These conflicts could include but are not limited to personal relationships with the authors, financial interests in the research, or competing academic interests. Reviewers must declare any such conflicts prior to accepting a review assignment. If a conflict of interest is identified, the manuscript may be reassigned to another reviewer. This policy upholds the integrity of the review process and ensures the impartiality and fairness of the journal’s editorial decisions.
