Editorial Policies
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Editors)
- Editorial Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Editorial Process
- Creative Commons License
- Publisher Policies
- Advertisement Policies
- COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
- COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors)
1. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement outlines the ethical principles followed by Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal to ensure that all published articles meet the highest standards of academic integrity. This statement addresses issues such as plagiarism, data fabrication, authorship disputes, and research misconduct. The policy emphasizes the journal's commitment to transparency, fairness, and adherence to internationally recognized ethical guidelines in publishing. Any cases of research misconduct are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated to maintain the integrity of the journal.
2. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (Specific to Editors)
The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures policy applies specifically to the editors of the journal. Editors are required to disclose any personal, financial, or professional interests that could potentially influence their editorial decisions. This transparency ensures that all editorial decisions are made impartially and without any bias. The policy aims to uphold the objectivity of the review and decision-making process, preventing conflicts from compromising the quality of the published content.
3. Editorial Policies
The Editorial Policies of Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal provide a comprehensive framework for the editorial process. These policies cover the roles and responsibilities of editors, submission guidelines, manuscript evaluation criteria, and the process for making editorial decisions. The editorial policies are designed to ensure consistency, fairness, and transparency in the publication process. They help maintain the quality and integrity of the journal, ensuring that each article meets high academic and ethical standards.
4. Peer Review Process
The Peer Review Process is fundamental to maintaining the scientific rigor of Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal. All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process, where both the authors and reviewers are anonymized to ensure objectivity. Reviewers evaluate the quality, originality, and significance of the research, providing constructive feedback to improve the manuscript. This process helps ensure that only high-quality research is published, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field of orthopedics and traumatology.
5. Editorial Process
The Editorial Process defines the steps taken by the editorial team from the submission of a manuscript to its final publication. After a manuscript is submitted, it is initially screened for plagiarism and adherence to the journal’s submission guidelines. If the manuscript passes this initial stage, it is assigned to relevant peer reviewers for detailed evaluation. After receiving feedback, the editor makes the final decision on whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. The editorial process ensures that every article published in the journal meets the required academic and ethical standards.
6. Creative Commons License
Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal follows the Creative Commons (CC BY) license for all its published articles. This license allows authors to retain copyright while permitting others to freely share, remix, and build upon the work, as long as proper attribution is given. The policy encourages the widespread dissemination of research, fostering collaboration and enabling other researchers to build on the work. This licensing model helps make orthopedic and traumatology research more accessible to the global academic community.
7. Publisher Policies
The Publisher Policies define the roles and responsibilities of Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal's publisher. These policies cover a wide range of issues, including editorial independence, ethical standards, conflict of interest, and transparency in the publishing process. The policies ensure that the journal adheres to best practices in academic publishing, maintains a high level of professionalism, and aligns with the latest industry standards. The publisher's goal is to maintain the integrity and reputation of the journal.
8. Advertisement Policies
The Advertisement Policies outline the guidelines for accepting advertisements in Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal. Advertisements are allowed but must not interfere with the editorial independence of the journal. The policy ensures that advertisements are clearly distinguishable from editorial content and that the scientific integrity of the journal is not compromised. The inclusion of advertisements is carefully managed to maintain the journal’s credibility and to avoid any conflicts of interest.
9. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
The COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism policy outlines how Orthopedics Research and Traumatology – Open Journal handles cases of plagiarism. The journal follows the guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to detect and address plagiarism in submitted manuscripts. This includes using plagiarism detection software and following a transparent process to resolve any identified issues. The policy ensures that plagiarism is dealt with swiftly and fairly, with possible consequences including article retraction and reporting to relevant institutions.
10. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (Specific to Editors)
The COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest policy for editors is designed to prevent any conflicts of interest in the editorial decision-making process. Editors must disclose any potential conflicts, including financial, personal, or professional relationships that could bias their decisions. This policy, aligned with COPE's best practices, ensures that editorial decisions are made impartially, protecting the integrity of the review process and the journal’s reputation.
