Reviewer Policies
Reviewers Guidelines
The Reviewers Guidelines at Radiology – Open Journal provide clear instructions to peer reviewers to ensure a fair, thorough, and transparent evaluation process. Reviewers are asked to assess the manuscript based on several key criteria, including scientific quality, methodological rigor, originality, relevance to the journal's scope, and clarity of presentation. The guidelines emphasize the importance of providing constructive feedback that can help authors improve their work while maintaining a professional and respectful tone. Reviewers are expected to evaluate the research impartially and refrain from any bias or conflicts of interest. Additionally, they should focus on the integrity of the data and ensure that all ethical standards are met, particularly regarding informed consent and patient confidentiality in radiological studies. Reviewers are asked to keep all manuscript details confidential and not use the knowledge gained from reviewing a manuscript for personal advantage. The guidelines also include the process of submitting reviews, outlining timelines and expectations for the feedback. By adhering to these guidelines, reviewers help maintain the journal’s high standards and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of radiology. This structured process ensures that published research is reliable, scientifically sound, and adds value to the academic and clinical communities.
Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to reviewers)
The Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures policy for reviewers at Radiology – Open Journal requires that all reviewers disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect their impartiality in reviewing a manuscript. This includes any financial, professional, or personal relationships that could influence the reviewer’s judgment. Common conflicts might include affiliations with institutions or companies related to the research or competing interests in the subject matter of the manuscript. Reviewers are required to provide a declaration of any such conflicts prior to accepting a review assignment. If a conflict is identified after the review is accepted, the reviewer must recuse themselves from the evaluation process to ensure an unbiased review. Additionally, reviewers are required to disclose any financial incentives, such as consulting fees or grants, that might influence their perspective on the manuscript. The policy is in place to protect the integrity of the peer review process and ensure that all evaluations are conducted fairly and transparently. If a reviewer fails to disclose relevant conflicts, the journal may take corrective actions, including removing the reviewer from the process. This policy supports the journal’s commitment to ethical publishing practices and fosters trust among authors, reviewers, and the wider scientific community.
