Editorial Policies

The Editorial Policies of Radiology – Open Journal outline the guidelines and standards for manuscript submission, peer review, and publication. These policies ensure that all articles published in the journal meet the highest academic and ethical standards. The editorial process is designed to maintain impartiality, transparency, and fairness. Editors and reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts based on scientific merit and relevance, without bias. Authors must follow the journal’s formatting and ethical guidelines, including proper citation practices and the requirement to disclose any conflicts of interest. The editorial board is responsible for upholding these policies and making decisions on manuscript acceptance, revisions, or rejection. The journal is committed to promoting diversity and inclusivity in its content and welcomes contributions from researchers worldwide. The editorial policies also include provisions for handling allegations of misconduct, such as plagiarism or falsification of data, ensuring that such issues are addressed promptly and transparently.

Editorial Process

The Editorial Process at Radiology – Open Journal ensures that all submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous evaluation process before publication. Upon submission, each manuscript is first reviewed by the journal’s editorial team to assess its suitability for the journal’s scope and quality standards. If deemed appropriate, the manuscript is sent to independent peer reviewers, who assess the quality of the research, the validity of the methods, and the significance of the findings. After peer review, the editorial team considers the reviewers’ feedback and makes a decision on whether to accept, reject, or request revisions. Authors are then notified of the decision, and they must address any revisions or comments before the manuscript can proceed to final acceptance. Throughout this process, the journal ensures transparency, fairness, and impartiality. The Radiology – Open Journal follows international best practices and adheres to guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to maintain the integrity of the peer review and editorial processes.

COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)

The COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors) policy ensures that editors at Radiology – Open Journal maintain transparency and impartiality in their decision-making. Editors are required to disclose any personal or financial conflicts of interest that could potentially influence their editorial judgment. This includes relationships with funding bodies, institutions, or companies whose interests might be affected by the publication. In cases where conflicts of interest are identified, the editor must recuse themselves from handling the manuscript in question to avoid any bias. The policy aligns with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which recommends that editors disclose conflicts in a clear and transparent manner. By following these practices, the journal ensures that its editorial decisions are based on the quality and integrity of the research rather than personal or financial considerations. This policy helps maintain trust and credibility within the academic community and ensures the ethical integrity of the journal.

Creative Commons License

The Creative Commons License policy of Radiology – Open Journal allows authors to retain copyright over their work while granting the journal the right to publish and distribute it freely. The journal uses the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits others to freely share, adapt, and build upon the work, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors. This license supports the open-access model, allowing readers to freely access, download, and share the published articles without restrictions. The policy aligns with the journal’s commitment to promoting the free dissemination of scientific knowledge and supporting the global exchange of information in radiology. Authors benefit from maintaining control over their work while contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field. The Creative Commons License fosters innovation by allowing others to build on published research, increasing the visibility and impact of the work.

Peer Review Process

The Peer Review Process at Radiology – Open Journal ensures that all submitted manuscripts are rigorously evaluated by experts in the field of radiology before publication. Each manuscript is assigned to independent, anonymous peer reviewers who assess the quality, validity, and significance of the research. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject matter and are tasked with providing constructive feedback to improve the manuscript. The journal follows a double-blind review process, meaning that both authors and reviewers are unaware of each other’s identities, ensuring impartiality. After receiving feedback, the authors may be asked to revise their manuscript to address reviewer comments or concerns. The editorial team ultimately makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ recommendations. This transparent and rigorous process ensures that only high-quality, scientifically sound research is published, and it upholds the credibility of the journal in the radiology field.

Publisher Policies

The Publisher Policies of Radiology – Open Journal define the rights, responsibilities, and expectations of authors, editors, and the journal publisher. The publisher ensures that the journal adheres to high standards of academic publishing, maintaining transparency and accountability throughout the editorial and peer review processes. The publisher also ensures that the journal complies with copyright laws and ethical guidelines for publication. These policies cover issues such as manuscript submission, conflict of interest, ethical approval for studies involving human or animal subjects, and adherence to the Creative Commons License for open access. The publisher’s role is to support the journal’s mission of disseminating high-quality research while upholding the integrity of the publication process. Additionally, the publisher works to promote the journal globally, facilitating the open-access dissemination of research findings and ensuring the sustainability of the journal through effective business practices.