Reviewer Policies
1. Reviewers Guidelines
Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal provides clear and comprehensive guidelines for its reviewers to ensure the peer-review process is conducted ethically, transparently, and efficiently. Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts based on scientific merit, originality, and relevance to the field of osteology and rheumatology. They should assess the clarity of the research questions, the soundness of the methodology, the appropriateness of the data analysis, and the validity of the conclusions. Reviewers must provide constructive feedback, offer suggestions for improving the manuscript, and highlight any potential issues with the content or presentation. They should maintain professionalism and confidentiality throughout the process.
2. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to reviewers)
To maintain objectivity and transparency in the peer-review process, Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal requires reviewers to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise due to personal, professional, or financial relationships. If a reviewer has any ties to the manuscript’s authors or the topic of the research that could influence their judgment, they must declare these relationships before accepting the assignment. This ensures that reviews are conducted impartially and that decisions are made based on the merits of the manuscript rather than any external influence. Reviewers are also required to report any financial interests or funding sources that could present a conflict.
