Editorial Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Creative Commons License
- Editorial Policies
- Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
- Advertisement Policies
- COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
- Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
- Editorial Process
- COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)
- Publisher Policies
1. Peer Review Process
The Peer Review Process is essential in ensuring that only high-quality, scientifically sound articles are published in Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal. Each manuscript is reviewed by experts in the relevant field, who assess the quality, validity, and relevance of the research. This rigorous process helps maintain the credibility of the journal and ensures that the published research is of the highest standard. Reviewers provide detailed feedback, guiding the authors to improve their work, and editors make the final decision based on their recommendations.
2. Creative Commons License
Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal adopts the Creative Commons License (CC BY) for all its published articles. This licensing model allows authors to retain copyright while allowing others to share, remix, and build upon their work, provided proper attribution is given. This license supports the journal’s goal of encouraging open access and ensuring that research is freely available for use and redistribution, which helps expand the dissemination and impact of scholarly work.
3. Editorial Policies
The Editorial Policies of Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal set out the guidelines for manuscript submission, review, and publication. These policies are designed to ensure that the journal adheres to the highest academic and ethical standards. The editorial board follows a set of transparent procedures to evaluate manuscripts, focusing on scientific merit, ethical conduct, and overall contribution to the field of osteology and rheumatology. These policies are intended to guide authors, editors, and reviewers in maintaining the journal’s integrity.
4. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to editors)
This policy requires that editors disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their editorial decisions. Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal emphasizes transparency and impartiality in all editorial decisions, which is why editors must declare any personal, financial, or professional relationships that could potentially bias their actions. This policy is in place to ensure that editorial decisions are made based on the merits of the research alone, without undue influence from external factors.
5. Advertisement Policies
The Advertisement Policies of Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal outline the conditions under which advertisements can be included in the journal. While the journal allows advertisements, these must not interfere with the editorial content. Advertisements should be clearly distinguishable from the academic articles to avoid any confusion or perceived bias in the research published. The journal’s independence from commercial interests is vital in maintaining the credibility and trustworthiness of its published content.
6. COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism
In line with the recommendations from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal has a strict Plagiarism Policy. All manuscripts are screened for plagiarism using advanced software to ensure the originality of the content. If any instances of plagiarism are detected, the manuscript will be rejected, and the issue will be addressed according to COPE guidelines. The policy ensures that the integrity of the scientific record is maintained and that authors follow ethical publishing standards.
7. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement outlines the ethical principles followed by Osteology and Rheumatology – Open Journal. This statement addresses key issues such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and research misconduct, and it establishes the procedures for handling allegations of unethical behavior. The policy ensures that authors, reviewers, and editors are aware of their ethical responsibilities and that any violations are addressed swiftly and transparently to protect the integrity of the journal.
8. Editorial Process
The Editorial Process outlines the steps involved in the review and publication of a manuscript. Once a manuscript is submitted, it undergoes an initial screening to ensure it meets the journal’s requirements. It is then assigned to peer reviewers who assess its quality and relevance. Based on the feedback received, the editor makes a decision on whether to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript. The editorial process is designed to be fair, transparent, and efficient, ensuring high-quality publications.
9. COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)
This policy, in alignment with COPE recommendations, requires editors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect their impartiality during the editorial process. Editors must declare personal, financial, or professional relationships that could influence their decision-making. This policy helps ensure transparency and objectivity in the review process, preventing bias from affecting the editorial decision and ensuring that the integrity of the peer-review system is upheld.
10. Publisher Policies
The Publisher Policies outline the responsibilities of the publisher in managing the journal’s operations. These policies cover ethical guidelines, manuscript handling, and the editorial decision-making process. The publisher ensures that the journal adheres to best practices in academic publishing, including compliance with international standards for scholarly publishing, such as those set by COPE, ICMJE, and other relevant bodies. These policies are in place to promote professionalism and ensure that all published content meets rigorous academic standards.
