Review procedure

The Journal of Dentistry follows a rigorous peer-review procedure to ensure the quality and scientific integrity of the manuscripts it publishes. Upon submission, the editorial team conducts an initial assessment of the manuscript to determine its relevance, adherence to the journal's guidelines, and overall quality. If the manuscript meets these criteria, it is sent for peer review to two or more independent experts in the relevant field of dentistry. The review process is typically double-blind, meaning both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other, allowing for impartial evaluations. Reviewers assess the manuscript for originality, methodological soundness, data interpretation, and overall contribution to the field of dentistry. Based on the feedback provided, authors may be asked to make revisions to improve the clarity, quality, or scientific rigor of their work. Once the revised manuscript is resubmitted, it may undergo further rounds of review before a final decision is made regarding its acceptance or rejection. The editorial team strives to provide authors with timely and constructive feedback to ensure the publication of high-quality research that advances the field of dentistry.