Editorial Policies

The editorial policies of Dentistry Open Journal ensure the highest standards of quality and fairness in the publication process. The journal aims to maintain impartiality, transparency, and scientific integrity in all stages of publication, from submission through to final decision-making.

The editorial board is responsible for overseeing the editorial policies and ensuring compliance with ethical guidelines. The journal is committed to providing an equal opportunity for all authors to have their work published, without discrimination based on nationality, gender, or affiliation.

Peer Review Process

The peer review process at Dentistry Open Journal is designed to ensure the integrity and quality of published research. Manuscripts are reviewed by independent experts in the field to assess the validity and significance of the research. The review process is double-blind, meaning that both the authors and reviewers are anonymous to each other.

The review process typically takes 4-6 weeks, and authors receive feedback on the quality and accuracy of their research. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript for originality, relevance to the field, methodology, and overall quality. Based on reviewer feedback, editors make a final decision on whether to accept, revise, or reject a manuscript.

Editorial Process

The editorial process at Dentistry Open Journal is rigorous and transparent. After submission, manuscripts are first reviewed by the editorial team for compliance with submission guidelines. If the manuscript is suitable, it proceeds to the peer review stage.

Once the peer review process is complete, the editorial board evaluates the feedback from reviewers and makes a decision. The authors are then informed of the decision, and if revisions are required, they are given specific instructions on how to address the reviewers’ comments. Upon final approval, the manuscript is published online and made available to the global research community.

Creative Commons License

All articles published in Dentistry Open Journal are available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. This license allows anyone to freely access, share, and adapt the material, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source of the publication.

The CC BY license promotes maximum dissemination of research and encourages open access to scientific knowledge, fostering further academic dialogue and collaboration.

Publisher Policies

The publisher of Dentistry Open Journal adheres to the highest standards of ethical publication. This includes a commitment to transparency, academic integrity, and the safeguarding of intellectual property. The publisher ensures that all policies related to publication ethics, peer review, and manuscript handling are followed to uphold the integrity of the scientific record.

Additionally, the publisher is dedicated to promoting open access to research and ensuring the widest possible dissemination of knowledge. The publisher also ensures compliance with legal and ethical regulations, including privacy laws, data protection, and copyright laws.

Advertisement Policies

Dentistry Open Journal accepts advertisements from reputable and ethical organizations, provided they do not conflict with the academic nature of the journal. All advertisements must be clearly distinguishable from editorial content, and advertisements should not influence or interfere with editorial decisions.

The journal maintains a policy of strict independence, ensuring that advertisements do not compromise the integrity of the journal or its editorial process. Any ads that are accepted will be reviewed for compliance with the journal’s standards and guidelines.

COPE Recommendation for Plagiarism

In accordance with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines, Dentistry Open Journal takes plagiarism very seriously. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are screened for potential plagiarism using advanced plagiarism detection software.

If plagiarism is detected, the journal follows COPE’s recommendations, including contacting the author to provide an explanation and taking corrective measures if necessary. In severe cases, the manuscript may be retracted, and the issue will be reported to the relevant institutions. The journal follows COPE’s guidelines to ensure that research integrity is upheld and that the reputation of the academic community is maintained.

COPE Recommendation for Conflict of Interest (specific to editors)

As outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), editors and reviewers at Dentistry Open Journal are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. This ensures that decisions are made based on the merit of the research and are free from any personal, financial, or professional bias.

All editors are expected to adhere to COPE’s guidelines for handling conflicts of interest. If an editor has a conflict of interest with a submitted manuscript, they must recuse themselves from the editorial decision-making process and delegate the responsibility to another editor. The journal ensures that any conflicts of interest are managed in a transparent and fair manner.