"I'm very happy to collaborate with Openventio: the review process was simple and straightforward, there were no setbacks. It is a journal that I consider at the highest scientific level."

"I am very happy to collaborate with Openventio, the review process was simple and straightforward, there were no setbacks It is a journal that I consider at the highest scientific level."

"I developed a great partnership with Openventio Publishers; their dedication towards our research was evident in all aspects. We appreciate their attention to detail. Your editorial help on my manuscript is highly appreciated!"

"My experience with the journal was very encouraging mainly due to the quick review process of the journal."

"Thank you for your cooperation throughout the publication process. I would like to thank all the reviewers for their valuable comments. It was good learning for me and I hope this work gets well utilized by the scientific community in Tobacco Control. "

"I know I speak on behalf of the whole authors when I say we have been delighted to work with you and with all respected reviewers over these past months. You have been a marvelous editor. Journal staff and editorial board members have worked very hard for this journal to establish its high standard and the professionalism of your team has been of the highest order. The success of getting this manuscript published has shown how much you bring to our work. We look forward to you continuing to work with us on different issues in the future. I strongly recommend this Journal to be indexed in Epidemiology reviews, science citation, and other reputed indexing sites. With our very best wishes, and thanks for all you have achieved for epidemiology science."

"In obtaining publication for my article, I received excellent service from the EPOJ Editorial Office; it can only be described as exemplary. Every time there was any correspondence or a query, the Editorial Office assistants were helpful, polite, attentive and friendly. I also liked the procedure of EPOJ in obtaining opinions regarding the article; it was sent to three reviewers, anonymously, and their comments relayed (anonymously) to me, and when I had made corrections or incorporated those views, the process was repeated. I thought this was fair, even-handed and without bias. I would certainly recommend EPOJ to any colleagues or if I have another article I wish to have published. Thank you again EPOJ Editorial Office."